RE: JNLP slave no longer works

2013-01-11 Thread Matthew.Webber
Of stuart.gr...@doccentrics.com Sent: 11 January 2013 10:39 To: jenkinsci-users@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: JNLP slave no longer works Thanks for the info, but how is this change applied to a linux slave? On Tuesday, 8 January 2013 02:50:39 UTC, Kohsuke Kawaguchi wrote: This is unfortunately

Re: JNLP slave no longer works

2013-01-11 Thread stuart . green
Webber *From:* jenkins...@googlegroups.com javascript: [mailto: jenkins...@googlegroups.com javascript:] *On Behalf Of * stuart...@doccentrics.com javascript: *Sent:* 11 January 2013 10:39 *To:* jenkins...@googlegroups.com javascript: *Subject:* Re: JNLP slave no longer works

Re: JNLP slave no longer works

2013-01-11 Thread Richard Mortimer
:* Re: JNLP slave no longer works Thanks for the info, but how is this change applied to a linux slave? On Tuesday, 8 January 2013 02:50:39 UTC, Kohsuke Kawaguchi wrote: This is unfortunately a necessary measure. See the Fix section in https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/SECURITY/Jenkins+Security

Re: JNLP slave no longer works

2013-01-11 Thread SBreitbach
The slave.jar from LTS 1.480.2 version has parameters -auth and -jnlpCredentials. Neither of them seems to work, I will get a Exception in thread main java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/commons/codec/binary/Base64 or java.io.IOException: Failed to load

Re: JNLP slave no longer works

2013-01-11 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 13-01-11 05:55 AM, matthew.web...@diamond.ac.uk wrote: Fixed by going to Manage Jenkins - Configure Global Security, and under Project-based Matrix Authorization Strategy I had to enable “connect” in the “slave” section, for user “Anonymous”. IIUC, that's going to leave your Jenkins

Re: JNLP slave no longer works

2013-01-11 Thread Les Mikesell
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Brian J. Murrell br...@interlinx.bc.ca wrote: Fixed by going to Manage Jenkins - Configure Global Security, and under Project-based Matrix Authorization Strategy I had to enable “connect” in the “slave” section, for user “Anonymous”. IIUC, that's going to

Re: JNLP slave no longer works

2013-01-11 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 13-01-11 08:44 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: Doesn't the connecting node name already have to be configured in jenkins Sure. But if anonymous read is allowed, anyone can see the node names. - and not already connected? Is disconnecting a node really that difficult? You could try attacking a

Re: JNLP slave no longer works

2013-01-11 Thread Kohsuke Kawaguchi
Yes, you just need to re-download the JNLP file from the master and overwrite the local copy at the slave. 2013/1/7 Jon Schewe jpsch...@mtu.net OK, so if I just keep the jnlp local now instead of always requesting it on startup, thing will continue to work, correct? On Monday, January 7,

Re: JNLP slave no longer works

2013-01-11 Thread Kohsuke Kawaguchi
Slaves installed as a service stores the secret token information in the startup configuration file, such as /etc/init/jenkins-slave-*.conf (Linux), /System/Library/LaunchDaemons/org.jenkins-ci.slave.*.plist (OS X), or $SLAVE_ROOT/jenkins-slave.xml (Windows). Look for seemingly meaningless

Re: JNLP slave no longer works

2013-01-11 Thread Kohsuke Kawaguchi
Agree with Brian here. Only do it when you are trusting the users of the network. 2013/1/11 Brian J. Murrell br...@interlinx.bc.ca On 13-01-11 05:55 AM, matthew.web...@diamond.ac.uk wrote: Fixed by going to Manage Jenkins - Configure Global Security, and under Project-based Matrix

Re: JNLP slave no longer works

2013-01-11 Thread Kohsuke Kawaguchi
If you want to be able to add slaves without configuring them first on the master, you can use the swarm slave plugin. 2013/1/11 Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Brian J. Murrell br...@interlinx.bc.ca wrote: Fixed by going to Manage Jenkins - Configure

Re: JNLP slave no longer works

2013-01-11 Thread Kohsuke Kawaguchi
: jenkinsci-users@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of * stuart.gr...@doccentrics.com *Sent:* 11 January 2013 10:39 *To:* jenkinsci-users@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: JNLP slave no longer works ** ** ** ** Thanks for the info, but how is this change applied to a linux slave? On Tuesday

RE: JNLP slave no longer works

2013-01-11 Thread Matthew.Webber
Kawaguchi Sent: 11 January 2013 14:16 To: jenkinsci-users@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: JNLP slave no longer works Slaves installed as a service stores the secret token information in the startup configuration file, such as /etc/init/jenkins-slave-*.conf (Linux), /System/Library/LaunchDaemons

Re: JNLP slave no longer works

2013-01-11 Thread Kohsuke Kawaguchi
2013/1/11 SBreitbach steffen.breitb...@1und1.de The slave.jar from LTS 1.480.2 version has parameters -auth and -jnlpCredentials. Neither of them seems to work, I will get a Exception in thread main java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/commons/codec/binary/Base64 or java.io.IOException:

RE: JNLP slave no longer works

2013-01-11 Thread Steffen Breitbach
We'll fix this in the next mainline release, and once all the fallout bugs like this are fixed and verified, I'll plan on another LTS release. My apologies for the problems in the mean time. No problem! The workaround using the anonymous user is OK for me in the meantime. :) smime.p7s

JNLP slave no longer works

2013-01-07 Thread Jon Schewe
I just upgraded to 1.480.2 from 1.471 and my JNLP slaves can no longer connect. I get an error: JNLPException[category: Download Error : Exception: java.io.IOException: Server returned HTTP response code: 403 for URL: https://server:8010/computer/slave-jnlp/slave-agent.jnlp : LaunchDesc: null ]

Re: JNLP slave no longer works

2013-01-07 Thread Kohsuke Kawaguchi
This is unfortunately a necessary measure. See the Fix section in https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/SECURITY/Jenkins+Security+Advisory+2013-01-04 2013/1/7 Jon Schewe jpsch...@mtu.net I just upgraded to 1.480.2 from 1.471 and my JNLP slaves can no longer connect. I get an error:

Re: JNLP slave no longer works

2013-01-07 Thread Jon Schewe
OK, so if I just keep the jnlp local now instead of always requesting it on startup, thing will continue to work, correct? On Monday, January 7, 2013, Kohsuke Kawaguchi wrote: This is unfortunately a necessary measure. See the Fix section in