Hello All (and most likely EJF)
GIVEN: A java.util.Iterator of External Address: jess.Fact objects
containing the results of a defquery asking for all shadow facts of a
certain type in working memory.
PROBLEM:Find the corresponding fact-ids of each External Address:
jess.Fact via Jess
I have a Java object, foo, which is not a bean. Foo has some function,
x, that returns a Java object, say a List. From within a Jess rules
file, I need to have access to foo, call x, obtaining the List. Foo is
originally instantiated from a Java program that is also responsible for
initiating
Hey thanks, Ernest.
I think that I was laboring under the misconception that not all of Jess's
API was exposed via the Jess language.
Just so I understand: All Jess API methods are accessible via Jess script as
you show below?
-JM
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Brenda K Hamilton wrote on May 26, 2004 6:13 AM:
I have a Java object, foo, which is not a bean. Foo has some function,
x, that returns a Java object, say a List. From within a Jess rules
file, I need to have access to foo, call x, obtaining the List. Foo is
originally instantiated from a Java
I think Jason Morris wrote:
Just so I understand: All Jess API methods are accessible via Jess script as
you show [in your previous message]?
Well, they're all there, but some of them you may not be able to
call. Methods that directly work with Value or ValueVector types
(i.e., as arguments or
Hi Jason,
I'm still playing with it. The examples in Chapter 5 is using the bind
and creating the Java object from within the Jess script. I am trying
to store the Java object from within a Java program, then executing the
Jess script that needs to access the Java object's functions.
Brenda
This is easily done. Assume you have in your java code a query
result set of type ResultSet, called rset1. In your java code, you
would do something like this:
Rete engine = new Rete(this);
...
ResultSet rset1 = null;
boolean results = stmt1.execute(SELECT ...);
if( results )
Hi all,
I am developing an application that involves a large number
of transient facts. Addition of facts is obviously not a problem;
deletion is a bit tricky. I was trying to make use of the logical
construct to remove facts.
for example, (defrule yo
(logical
I think Mithun Sheshagiri wrote:
logical construct which has been reported and fixed in the 6.1p7 version
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg05983.html
Note that this is an incremental reset problem only -- i.e., it only
happens if the rules are defined after the facts they
Hello,
Thank you for your prompt response. If you meant that the
proper ordering solves the problem in version 6.1p7 then please ignore
the remainder of the mail.
I defined the rule first and then asserted the fact that triggers the
rule. Here is trace of what I tried.
Jess
10 matches
Mail list logo
