I think Ozsariyildiz, S.S. wrote:
>
> I will give very general overview that I can think of.
> 1) two ways support one implicit support just extension to jess reflection
> 2) explicit support making the templates type-checked enums and annotations
> defined. May also include definition of met
As an "old Jess" programmer and an "old C/C++ programmer, I remember
the "cool" part of using STL in C++. Now we have AOP in Java and
Java Generics. All of this really is "cool" and adds "power" to the
programmer. HOWEVER (which means that you can forget all the former
platitudes mention
I think Ozsariyildiz, S.S. wrote:
> Is there going to be support for Java Generics for the future releases of
> JESS? If there is one what are the plans?
An interesting question. Jess is weakly typed, and generics are a
mechanism for making things more strongly type-checked at compile
time; they
I think Ozsariyildiz, S.S. wrote:
> Is there going to be support for Java Generics for the future releases of
> JESS? If there is one what are the plans?
An interesting question. Jess is weakly typed, and generics are a
mechanism for making things more strongly type-checked at compile
time; they
Is there going to be support for Java Generics for the future releases of JESS? If there is one what are the plans?
Thanks
