Jess is capable of reflection on rules and other objects. But reflection
delivers formal/structural information but no semantic insights.
Are you prepared to add meta-facts that would, for instance, define the
meaning of (uncleOf a b)? If so, it would be possible to produce the
reasoning
by invest
There's a method "Rete.getThisActivation()" that you can call while a
rule is firing; it gives you a jess.Activation object, which in turn
gives you the Defrule object and the jess.Token (i.e., the list of
facts the rule fired on.) So from the right hand side of a rule, you
can get all the
Hi all,
I am trying to develop a program where based on a set of facts and rules
a user gets presented with a certain conclusion (I reckon that holds for
almost any Jess program ;)), but also with the reasoning path that led
to that conclusion. Essentially, I need to implement a
"why"-functionali
