Re: JESS: seemingly mysterious defquery behavior

2003-03-31 Thread un ethix
I think you could say that you won! :)So what I would do, if I were you, would be to upgrade to 6.1RC1 andthings will behave by default just the way you'd like them to. Excellent. I'm sure I'm not the only one who appreciates the constant work that you put into the regular updates and

Re: JESS: seemingly mysterious defquery behavior

2003-03-31 Thread James C. Owen
Ernest: Does this mean that Jess will become more of a goal-oriented rulebased programming tool? Or, perchance good fortune ensues, incorporate full-opportunistic backward chaining; sort of like the old Expert (C/C++ Rulebase from Neuron Data) used to do? I don't know of ANY rulebase in Java

Re: JESS: seemingly mysterious defquery behavior

2003-03-30 Thread ejfried
The long-running debate between the people like yourself, who are surprised when rules fire during a query, and those who want a query to trigger backward chaining, and so are surprised if they don't, has been resolved -- and I think you could say that you won! In recent versions of Jess 6.1