Re: JESS: calling a method on a matched shadow fact

2007-01-15 Thread Ernest Friedman-Hill
o have a variable on which to do some tests without having to call getXYZ for each one of them. Thanks > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: JESS: calling a method on a matched shadow fact > Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 00:46:42 -0500 > To: jess-users@sandia.gov > >

RE: JESS: calling a method on a matched shadow fact

2007-01-15 Thread Skeptic 2000
them. Thanks > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: JESS: calling a method on a matched > shadow fact> Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 00:46:42 -0500> To: jess-users@sandia.gov> > > On Nov 2, 2006, at 1:29 PM, Skeptic 2000 wrote:> > > >> > Let's say

Re: JESS: calling a method on a matched shadow fact

2006-11-02 Thread Ernest Friedman-Hill
On Nov 2, 2006, at 1:29 PM, Skeptic 2000 wrote: Let's say I have something like : (defclass xyz x.y.com.XYZ) (defrule "x" ?x<-(xyz) => (...) In the RHS, I would like to call a method that is not a bean get/ set on the matched 'xyz', what would be the proper way? (If possible, this metho