I think [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Am I wrong to say that the 'misfeature' mentioned below hasn't made it > into a feature yet in the latest release 7.0 b4? > Is there any plan to still add it in time for 7.0 final? > > I've written defadvice for every numeric Jess-function (+, -, *, /, <, <=, > >, >=, =, <>, min, max, div, ...) to support BigDecimals only to discover > that they don't support nesting. > The only solution I see for now is to convert them into deffunctions, and > go through all my rules one by one to change the function call. >
This had completely "fallen off the radar," but now that you've brought it up, I'll put it on the list. Thanks for the reminder. --------------------------------------------------------- Ernest Friedman-Hill Advanced Software Research Phone: (925) 294-2154 Sandia National Labs FAX: (925) 294-2234 PO Box 969, MS 9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Livermore, CA 94550 http://herzberg.ca.sandia.gov -------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]' in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the list (use your own address!) List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
