Jetspeed Daily Build Results - Fri, 16 Feb 2001 09:24:06 GMT

2001-02-17 Thread Jon S . Stevens
This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/latest/jetspeed.html -- -- To

newbie: jetspeed-1.3a1

2001-02-17 Thread Ken'ichi Unnai
Hi jetspeed crew, I'm recently trying to catch up with Jetspeed. What I'm using is jakarta-tomcat-3.2.1/jetspeed-1.3a1. ...the problem is when I start it, then it raises strange error message: % tomcat-dir/bin/startup.sh ... ... initializing all services using

[Admin] Documentation generation change

2001-02-17 Thread Raphaƫl Luta
I've just changed the documentation generation tool used for building Jetspeed docs from Stylebook to Anakia. We now use the Jarkarta site stylesheets. This has several consequences: - I reworked the build system for checking on the correct dependencies - For building the docs, you must now

build.sh errors

2001-02-17 Thread Michael Sallman
I just did a checkout from cvs and got the following errors trying to do the build: ls: ../../jakarta-site2/lib/jdom*.jar: No such file or directory ./build.sh: [: ==: binary operator expected ./build.sh: [: ==: binary operator expected type: jikes: not found Java Home: /home/java/jdk1.2.2 Java

Re: Next Release

2001-02-17 Thread Jon Stevens
on 2/16/01 12:42 AM, "Anthony W. Marino" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It appeared to me that for a period of time JetSpeed development had reached a quiet period with not much happening, however, there now seems to be a resurgence. Is there anything that has changed within the project

[ADMIN] READ NOW!

2001-02-17 Thread Jon Stevens
Hey all, Please only copy the relevant portions of email messages (ie: to keep the context of the discussion) and delete the rest. I see some of you replying to a message and then only putting a couple lines into the middle of a message and sending it. By doing that, it makes it very hard for

RE: [Admin] Documentation generation change

2001-02-17 Thread David Sean Taylor
I've not yet updated the web site with the new docs as I'd first like all the people involved to review the docs and fix any error or obsolete text you may encounter. it looks nice - imo, nicer than stylebook 'build docs' worked without a problem i fixed 3 bad links on index.xml and there

Re: [Admin] Documentation generation change

2001-02-17 Thread Jon Stevens
on 2/17/01 2:12 PM, "David Sean Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it looks nice - imo, nicer than stylebook 'build docs' worked without a problem i fixed 3 bad links on index.xml and there are a few more minor things i need to sort out, but overall looks great! -- david FYI, please put

Jetspeed Daily Build Results - Sat, 17 Feb 2001 09:40:39 GMT

2001-02-17 Thread Jon S . Stevens
This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/latest/jetspeed.html -- -- To