I've checked in the rest of my modifications:
- use the new services
- remove some unused code
- rename turbine package to modules
- changed the config files
The CVS head seems stable for me since a fresh checkout builds and
runs properly under Tomcat.
A few misc. changes:
- I removed the
Hello,
Now that I have a decent network connection again, I'll commit the bunch of changes
I've done over the week-end once I've catched up with my real work...
Here are a list of modifications :
Services:
=
I've created a couple of services.
What I have ready:
* EngineContext
This is
Santiago Gala wrote:
Raphael Luta wrote:
* URLManager
This started as a port of the BadURLManager code but morphed into a new service.
The
idea behind the idea is : why have a service that only deal with bad urls when you
can
have a service that deal with any URL and affects them
Raphael Luta wrote:
Santiago Gala wrote:
Raphael Luta wrote:
* URLManager
This started as a port of the BadURLManager code but morphed into a new service.
The
idea behind the idea is : why have a service that only deal with bad urls when
you can
have a service that deal
Jon Stevens wrote:
on 11/21/2000 3:58 AM, "Raphael Luta" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
There's no "glue" between Jetspeed and Turbine.
In this implementation, nearly everything we use in Jetspeed builds on top of
Turbine: services, resources, modules, etc...
Why only mark the modules as
David Sean Taylor wrote:
So what you are suggesting is that Jetspeed has only one entry point from
the Turbine servlet.
Now it is the Turbine Screen org.apache.jetspeed.turbine.screens.Home.
With the subclassing of the Turbine servlet, it gave me some ideas about
using 'interceptors' to
Raphael Luta wrote:
David Sean Taylor wrote:
So what you are suggesting is that Jetspeed has only one entry point from
the Turbine servlet.
Now it is the Turbine Screen org.apache.jetspeed.turbine.screens.Home.
With the subclassing of the Turbine servlet, it gave me some ideas
I've just committed the new services in the CVS but not the
code for gluing them with the other classes because I have
some problem with my build since I merged the Turbine upgrade
code...
This should not break anything since the new code isn't called
right now (I've checked that CVS head still
Is it safe to assume that the cvs is unstable. It
seems lots of changes are being put through, and this
makes it difficult to make the configuration work.
Are you planning on stablizing jetspeed soon? I have
been tring to get the cvs version to work. Should i
go back to the released version
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Raphael Luta
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 12:07 PM
To: JetSpeed
Subject: Re: CVS Clean-Up, Part 2: services, architecture
David Sean Taylor wrote:
So what you are suggesting
Anthony Mills wrote:
Is it safe to assume that the cvs is unstable. It
seems lots of changes are being put through, and this
makes it difficult to make the configuration work.
Are you planning on stablizing jetspeed soon? I have
been tring to get the cvs version to work. Should i
go
11 matches
Mail list logo
