/2000 02:16:37
Please respond to "JetSpeed" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Thomas Boehme/Germany/IBM)
Subject: Re: multithreading problems in the portlet drawing?
Neeme Praks wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
burtonator wrote:
Neeme Praks wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 2:29 AM
To: JetSpeed; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: multithreading problems in the portlet drawing?
[snip]
I think
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of burtonator
[snip]
I would vote for passing RunData. This means less object
generation.
I know that is a major change, but we should make sure
we are doing
things right.
*totally*
I have been looking at a few problems with a customer that is using
Jetspeed as a base for portal development.
They are trying to have a system that could manage sessions when a user
has no/has disabled cookies. I found that turbine supports this quite
easily. It is enough with using in every
