> Are updates on the new releases?
Sorry this took so long to get back to you. Our discussion on jetspeed-user
got side-tracked. Here is the updated / proposed Roadmap. Its not too
aggressive, but thus far there are only two of us committed to delivering
any of the proposed issues that I know of.
> Are updates on the new releases?
Yes, I will propose a new RoadMap by tomorrow here on this list and on the
Linked In group. Of course its just a proposal, and your input is welcome!
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 6:41 AM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
> I have sent you an invitation to join the Jetspeed port
> Are updates on the new releases?
Yes, I will propose a new RoadMap by tomorrow here on this list and on the
Linked In group. Of course its just a proposal, and your input is welcome!
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 5:41 AM, Mads Orehoj Sorensen wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am looking at the http://portals.apac
I have sent you an invitation to join the Jetspeed portal group on LinkedIn.
http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Jetspeed-Portal-3347198
It is open to anyone with an interest in Jetspeed.
I believe that there will be an updated Jetspeed roadmap soon.
I will ask David Sean Taylor to add it to the gro
elocityPortlet.
>
> But as you say issue for 2.2.4
>
>
>
>
> From: David S Taylor
> To: Jetspeed Developers List ,
> Date: 28-05-2013 20:45
> Subject:Re: roadmap
>
>
>
> > Admin was all rewritten in Wicket in 2.2.x.
>
> Tha
List ,
Date: 28-05-2013 20:45
Subject:Re: roadmap
> Admin was all rewritten in Wicket in 2.2.x.
That reminds me: another potential issue for the roadmap - I believe
Wicket
discontinued their portlet support. So yes, I would say this is more of
an
issue to be solved in 2.2.4.
--
Da
t;> dojo 2).
>>
>> The roadmap includes "Administrative Portlet Improvements" for version
>> 2.2.4, will these improvements build on the 0.4.1 dojo code? or is dojo
>> entirely removed?
>>
>> /Mads
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Fr
ot;Administrative Portlet Improvements" for version
> 2.2.4, will these improvements build on the 0.4.1 dojo code? or is dojo
> entirely removed?
>
> /Mads
>
>
>
>
> From: David S Taylor
> To: Jetspeed Developers List ,
> Date: 28-05-2013 18:35
> Subject:
Taylor
To: Jetspeed Developers List ,
Date: 28-05-2013 18:35
Subject: Re: roadmap
Dojo changed drastically with 1.x. Just upgrading to the latest version is
not going to work. 1.x was not backward compatible 0.4, and would've
required substantial investment of code migration to get
Perhaps it is under "Administrative Portlet Improvements"?
>
> /Mads
>
>
>
>
> From: David S Taylor
> To: Jetspeed Developers List ,
> Date: 28-05-2013 17:25
> Subject:Re: roadmap
>
>
>
> We dropped the Jetspeed Desktop, based on Dojo, for
>
> dojo 1.8 / 1.9 in the jetui (jetspeed are based on 0.4.1 which is 6-7
> years old).
>
> Best regards
>
> Mads
>
>
>
> From: Ron Wheeler
> To: jetspeed-dev@portals.apache.org,
> Date: 28-05-2013 15:00
> Subject:Re: roadmap
>
>
>
the jetui (jetspeed are based on 0.4.1 which is 6-7
> years old).
>
> Best regards
>
> Mads
>
>
>
> From: Ron Wheeler
> To: jetspeed-dev@portals.apache.org,
> Date: 28-05-2013 15:00
> Subject:Re: roadmap
>
>
>
> Any chance of Spring
Yes, thanks for the reminder. I added it to the roadmap and updated the
live site
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 6:00 AM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
> Any chance of Spring 3?
>
> Ron
>
> On 27/05/2013 10:10 PM, David S Taylor wrote:
>
>> I updated the roadmap, it was a bit too aggressive. This revision tries
Any chance for
dojo 1.8 / 1.9 in the jetui (jetspeed are based on 0.4.1 which is 6-7
years old).
Best regards
Mads
From: Ron Wheeler
To: jetspeed-dev@portals.apache.org,
Date: 28-05-2013 15:00
Subject:Re: roadmap
Any chance of Spring 3?
Ron
On 27/05/2013 10:10 PM
Any chance of Spring 3?
Ron
On 27/05/2013 10:10 PM, David S Taylor wrote:
I updated the roadmap, it was a bit too aggressive. This revision tries to
keep 2.2.3 release confined to a theme of "upgrading to latest versions..."
mainly:
- Java 1.6
- Tomcat 7
- Servlet 3.0
- Maven 3
I also added JB
15 matches
Mail list logo
