Re: [Admin] Documentation generation change

2001-02-22 Thread Raphaƫl Luta
At 11:45 20/02/2001 +0100, you wrote: At 18:44 02/17/01, Raphal Luta wrote: I've not yet updated the web site with the new docs as I'd first like all the people involved to review the docs and fix any error or obsolete text you may encounter. I scanned through the docs and changed a few lines.

Re: [Admin] Documentation generation change

2001-02-22 Thread Jon Stevens
on 2/21/01 1:19 AM, "Raphal Luta" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think it would be prefer to only use "standard" jakarta-site2 macros, unless really necessary, so that we don't have to use or own vsl macros definitions. FYI, you can define your own macros very easily (and this is perfectly

Re: [Admin] Documentation generation change

2001-02-20 Thread ingo schuster
At 18:44 02/17/01, Raphal Luta wrote: I've not yet updated the web site with the new docs as I'd first like all the people involved to review the docs and fix any error or obsolete text you may encounter. I scanned through the docs and changed a few lines. I'm not sure about following

Re: [Admin] Documentation generation change

2001-02-20 Thread ingo schuster
At 18:44 02/17/01, Raphal Luta wrote: I've not yet updated the web site with the new docs as I'd first like all the people involved to review the docs and fix any error or obsolete text you may encounter. I updated the usejetspeed.xml with the site examples posted a few weeks ago. Shall we put

Re: [Admin] Documentation generation change

2001-02-20 Thread mpoeschl
Quoting ingo schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED]: A thing I can't easily change is following: The source tag doesn't work (e.g. "PSML"), don't know why. It possibly doesn't like xml inside?? ingo. the use of s2 is not supported. so you have to remove the s2 tags or extend the site.vsl in

RE: [Admin] Documentation generation change

2001-02-17 Thread David Sean Taylor
I've not yet updated the web site with the new docs as I'd first like all the people involved to review the docs and fix any error or obsolete text you may encounter. it looks nice - imo, nicer than stylebook 'build docs' worked without a problem i fixed 3 bad links on index.xml and there

Re: [Admin] Documentation generation change

2001-02-17 Thread Jon Stevens
on 2/17/01 2:12 PM, "David Sean Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it looks nice - imo, nicer than stylebook 'build docs' worked without a problem i fixed 3 bad links on index.xml and there are a few more minor things i need to sort out, but overall looks great! -- david FYI, please put