Re: question on exports to

On 03.06.2016 22:20, Alex Buckley wrote: [...] Why don't you believe it? The "Under The Hood" presentation shows that layer creation makes the JVM aware of modules and their relationships. because I was thinking it will lower performance. Sure, benchmarks are often driven by code of

Re: question on exports to

On 6/3/2016 11:49 AM, Jochen Theodorou wrote: On 01.06.2016 20:54, Peter Levart wrote: [...] Modules are part of language. Their exports / requires form a logical layer of additional access checks to what we had before (public/protected/package/private qualifiers on classes / members), but are

Re: question on exports to

On 01.06.2016 21:07, Alex Buckley wrote: Pretend you never heard of Module::addReads, it's for a use case that doesn't matter here (generation of bytecode with constant pool references to classes in other modules). good advice, that I will follow ;) Core Reflection is still bound by the

Re: question on exports to

On 01.06.2016 20:54, Peter Levart wrote: [...] Modules are part of language. Their exports / requires form a logical layer of additional access checks to what we had before (public/protected/package/private qualifiers on classes / members), but are treated the same way during runtime. Together

Re: White-listing sensitive linker targets

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Alex Buckley wrote: > On 6/2/2016 10:22 AM, Mike Samuel wrote: >> >> It sounds like the tech lead, specialists, and build master can >> exercise oversight using tools that just >> >> 1. look at the exports...to... relationships which should

Re: Non-core components are no longer defined to the boot loader

(I've changed the subject line as this thread is no longer about multi release JARs). On 03/06/2016 11:13, Andrew Dinn wrote: : Of course, no one is against security just as no one is against apple pie. Unfortunately, "de-privileging" is one of those vanilla words like "modernisation" that

hg: jigsaw/jake/hotspot: 2 new changesets

Changeset: 9d90a83ddcc0 Author:lana Date: 2016-06-02 20:33 + URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/hotspot/rev/9d90a83ddcc0 Added tag jdk-9+121 for changeset 7e293105dbb0 ! .hgtags Changeset: 2593cd67408d Author:alanb Date: 2016-06-03 07:00 +0100 URL:

hg: jigsaw/jake/langtools: 19 new changesets

Changeset: 5b344cfeb8c8 Author:sadayapalam Date: 2016-05-25 19:30 +0530 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/langtools/rev/5b344cfeb8c8 8047024: 7 ANNOT tests in JCK9 test suite fail with an AssertionError for exception_index Summary: Fix incorrect assertion about exception

hg: jigsaw/jake/corba: 2 new changesets

Changeset: 26df083b5aa3 Author:lana Date: 2016-06-02 20:33 + URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/corba/rev/26df083b5aa3 Added tag jdk-9+121 for changeset 9a5fc5a27560 ! .hgtags Changeset: 339c2df3a451 Author:alanb Date: 2016-06-03 07:01 +0100 URL:

hg: jigsaw/jake/nashorn: 6 new changesets

Changeset: 93c5020dd976 Author:sundar Date: 2016-05-25 11:03 +0530 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/nashorn/rev/93c5020dd976 8157789: Nashorn sample/test.js should not use undocumented System property Reviewed-by: mchung ! samples/test.js Changeset: 9c62b456f075

hg: jigsaw/jake/jaxp: 2 new changesets

Changeset: 06a850e64ad5 Author:lana Date: 2016-06-02 20:33 + URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/jaxp/rev/06a850e64ad5 Added tag jdk-9+121 for changeset a265b8116058 ! .hgtags Changeset: d838b6e10f5e Author:alanb Date: 2016-06-03 07:00 +0100 URL:

hg: jigsaw/jake/jaxws: 2 new changesets

Changeset: d3b178691715 Author:lana Date: 2016-06-02 20:33 + URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/jaxws/rev/d3b178691715 Added tag jdk-9+121 for changeset fb771fa3a986 ! .hgtags Changeset: 0dc9705d3746 Author:alanb Date: 2016-06-03 07:01 +0100 URL: