Changeset: cca505877738
Author:alanb
Date: 2017-02-04 07:28 +
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/hotspot/rev/cca505877738
VerifyMethodHandles can't verify access check without lookup modes when caller
is jl.Object
! src/share/vm/prims/methodHandles.cpp
Hi!
> I think one option we should consider is to perhaps disable automatic
> modules for 9 and revisit the idea for 10, as it's late in the day and
> still clearly not settled.
I disagree. The idea that modules should not depend "on the chaos of the
class path" seems to be a very good one.
On 03/02/2017 18:17, Juergen Hoeller wrote:
Spring's classpath scanning works fine on JDK 9 for classpath resources
(archives as well directories) and also for archives on the module path.
One API to look at for scanning the module path is
ModuleFinder.of(Path...). That will give you the set
On Feb 3, 2017 10:04 PM, wrote:
Send jigsaw-dev mailing list submissions to
jigsaw-dev@openjdk.java.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/jigsaw-dev
or, via email, send a
Changeset: 5135bbdae96f
Author:mchung
Date: 2017-02-03 13:50 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/jdk/rev/5135bbdae96f
Add @spec tag on additional APIs for JPMS spec
! src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/StackTraceElement.java
!
On 03/02/2017 18:17, Juergen Hoeller wrote:
Spring's classpath scanning works fine on JDK 9 for classpath resources
(archives as well directories) and also for archives on the module path.
However, it does not work for an exploded module layout, simply
because
For "requires static" specifically, this effect is quite dramatic since it
makes the optional runtime dependency feature useless for a large number of
target scenarios.
Alright, I'll re-test against build 156+ then.
Juergen
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Alan Bateman
On 03/02/2017 18:14, Juergen Hoeller wrote:
:
Was it intentional for "requires static" to work that way? Am I missing
something? From my perspective, "requires static" means that the referenced
module has to be present when compiling the declaring module... but not
when compiling other modules
Spring's classpath scanning works fine on JDK 9 for classpath resources
(archives as well directories) and also for archives on the module path.
However, it does not work for an exploded module layout, simply
because ClassLoader.getResource("mypackageroot") always returns null in
such a scenario.
I've been experimenting with a Spring/Hibernate application on Jigsaw
again, in particular with respect to including module-info descriptors in
our framework jars... as opposed to using the framework jars as automatic
modules.
Unfortunately, it seems that "requires static" is transitive at
On 03/02/2017 16:42, David M. Lloyd wrote:
:
Sure, but the set of JARs you can't rewrite is really pretty spare.
I've no doubt that many people would be uncomfortable taking
responsibility to modularize a component that they don't maintain or
have full knowledge of. In the early
On 02/03/2017 09:40 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 03/02/2017 11:44, Robert Scholte wrote:
Hi Nicolai,
let's consider that my project depends on the following dependencies:
com.foo.bar:library:1.0 and com.acme:library:2.3.1, both unnamed.
I somehow want to have them both as requirements:
module
On 02/03/2017 08:43 AM, Andrew Dinn wrote:
On 03/02/17 14:29, David M. Lloyd wrote:
I think one option we should consider is to perhaps disable automatic
modules for 9 and revisit the idea for 10, as it's late in the day and
still clearly not settled.
I don't think this is thinking about the
On 3 February 2017 at 15:40, Alan Bateman wrote:
> I think automatic modules are critical to migration, otherwise things move
> at the pace of the slowest project (which might be 0km/h in case of
> unmaintained projects). A lot of the discussion here has been on the
On 03/02/2017 11:44, Robert Scholte wrote:
Hi Nicolai,
let's consider that my project depends on the following dependencies:
com.foo.bar:library:1.0 and com.acme:library:2.3.1, both unnamed.
I somehow want to have them both as requirements:
module M.N {
requires static library; //
On 03/02/17 14:29, David M. Lloyd wrote:
> I think one option we should consider is to perhaps disable automatic
> modules for 9 and revisit the idea for 10, as it's late in the day and
> still clearly not settled.
I don't think this is thinking about the trade-off correctly.
Automatic modules
I think one option we should consider is to perhaps disable automatic
modules for 9 and revisit the idea for 10, as it's late in the day and
still clearly not settled.
On 02/03/2017 05:44 AM, Robert Scholte wrote:
Hi Nicolai,
let's consider that my project depends on the following
Changeset: a0a6f078fefe
Author:alanb
Date: 2017-02-03 12:06 +
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/jdk/rev/a0a6f078fefe
Tighten up ModuleReader for exploded modules
! src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/module/ModuleReader.java
!
Hi Nicolai,
let's consider that my project depends on the following dependencies:
com.foo.bar:library:1.0 and com.acme:library:2.3.1, both unnamed.
I somehow want to have them both as requirements:
module M.N {
requires static library; // com.foo.bar:library
requires library; //
Changeset: 17a11ffc6a0a
Author:jlahoda
Date: 2017-01-24 13:29 +0100
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/langtools/rev/17a11ffc6a0a
8153759: jshell tool: Smart completion detection is not reliable
Summary: Reverting back to smart completion if any action follows a completion
Changeset: d191fcd1525d
Author:rgoel
Date: 2017-01-24 12:06 +0530
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/jdk/rev/d191fcd1525d
8167273: Calendar.getDisplayNames inconsistent with DateFormatSymbols
Reviewed-by: naoto
! make/gensrc/GensrcLocaleData.gmk
!
Changeset: e20d7e4a25ac
Author:adinn
Date: 2017-01-26 11:47 -0500
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/hotspot/rev/e20d7e4a25ac
8173339: AArch64: Fix minimum stack size computations
Reviewed-by: aph
! src/cpu/aarch64/vm/globals_aarch64.hpp
Changeset: 7b0f663ad09c
Author:
Changeset: 83c33cc9f158
Author:lana
Date: 2017-02-02 21:20 +
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/jaxws/rev/83c33cc9f158
Added tag jdk-9+155 for changeset 9b9918656c97
! .hgtags
Changeset: 9af8d95119b5
Author:alanb
Date: 2017-02-03 09:34 +
URL:
Changeset: b33379591dea
Author:coffeys
Date: 2017-01-25 12:09 +
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/corba/rev/b33379591dea
8077395: org.omg.CORBA_2_3.portable.InputStream constructor should not specify
JDK-specific property
Reviewed-by: lancea, rriggs
!
Changeset: 620d0c38581f
Author:clanger
Date: 2017-01-24 11:10 +0100
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/jaxp/rev/620d0c38581f
8173261: JAXP: TESTBUG: javax/xml/jaxp/isolatedjdk/catalog/PropertiesTest.sh
Reviewed-by: dfuchs, fyuan
! test/ProblemList.txt
!
Changeset: 33169b3b9542
Author:chegar
Date: 2017-01-25 14:10 +
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/rev/33169b3b9542
8173354: javadoc warning notice for types in Incubator Modules
Reviewed-by: erikj, michaelm
! make/Javadoc.gmk
Changeset: c7e03e50dd5c
Author:lana
Changeset: 9aa94f11a8b9
Author:sundar
Date: 2017-01-24 18:08 +0530
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/nashorn/rev/9aa94f11a8b9
8173257: test/script/trusted/JDK-8021189.js and
test/script/trusted/JDK-8021129.js fail in nashorn nightly
Reviewed-by: hannesw, jlaskey
!
27 matches
Mail list logo