Hi Alex,
> On 7/4/2017 12:02 AM, Langer, Christoph wrote:
> > I have some piece of software that we ship as a jar file and which
> > will hence run on a JDK 9 in the unnamed module. However, this jar
> > file contains a package that is also contained in our JDK image in a
> > module that is always
Hi Christoph,
On 7/4/2017 12:02 AM, Langer, Christoph wrote:
I have some piece of software that we ship as a jar file and which
will hence run on a JDK 9 in the unnamed module. However, this jar
file contains a package that is also contained in our JDK image in a
module that is always part of th
On 06/07/2017 13:03, Langer, Christoph wrote:
Hi there,
for our JDK 9 image the jtreg test jdk/modules/etc/VerifyModuleDelegation has
unveiled a problem.
The issue is that we introduced a few modules that are defined as a platform
module. One of these modules requires jdk.attach which is ne
Hi there,
for our JDK 9 image the jtreg test jdk/modules/etc/VerifyModuleDelegation has
unveiled a problem.
The issue is that we introduced a few modules that are defined as a platform
module. One of these modules requires jdk.attach which is neither boot nor
platform. The code within the modu