default,
> the real question is why the compiler of the openjdk version 10.0.1 doesn't
> generate the required module version.
That is another good point! This build is the one distributed on Arch
Linux. This was the procedure used to build it (no patches are applied):
https://git.ar
tion obviously breaks reproducibility, so it'd
be nice if it could be turned off!
The sources to the above module descriptor are available [2] if anyone
wants to try compiling this for themselves. The SHA256 of the resulting
module-info.class should be
e7a94b5a2788a3c5cd6d7f586e70a0f2138a2eaa0e75144b6a16e75c4b297870 if
your compiler produces the same output as mine.
[0] https://reproducible-builds.org/
[1] https://adoptopenjdk.net/
[2] https://github.com/io7m/jtensors
--
Mark Raynsford | http://www.io7m.com
On 2018-05-09T18:53:32 +0100
Mark Raynsford <org.open...@io7m.com> wrote:
> On 2018-05-07T04:19:55 -0700
> Mike Hearn <m...@plan99.net> wrote:
>
> > I did a bit of experimentation to learn how different operating systems
> > support loading shared libr
braindump, which may lead
> nowhere but at least it'll be written down.
How do the BSDs cope with this?
I suspect that OpenBSD will not have any support for this at all, but
FreeBSD might.
--
Mark Raynsford | http://www.io7m.com
ilable" events
until after they'd appeared doesn't mean you should miss the events.
OSGi does handle this (it's written into the spec), but I don't know
quite how the implementations handle it.
--
Mark Raynsford | http://www.io7m.com
On 2018-02-12T11:44:07 +
Mark Raynsford <org.open...@io7m.com> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> As a long time Java developer, I've only ever had to deal with signing
> jar files. I can obviously sign jar files once on whatever platform I
> choose to use to build the code, and the
d completely overlooked this constructor.
> ModuleDescriptor.read is an easy way to parse the module-info.class in
> case you need it.
Yes, I'm planning to move to this from ASM.
--
Mark Raynsford | http://www.io7m.com
plans to implement anything that's capable of signing
macOS binaries and resources in a platform-independent way so that
jlink-produced distributions can work without warnings? Is that even a
reasonable thing to request? I've no idea how "private" Apple keep
their signing implementation.
nd to act as the new stream A when B
reaches EOF). It uses a constant amount of storage (the fixed-size read
buffer per-stream) and doesn't seem to consume any extra file
descriptors (because the JVM is obviously just reading bytes from a
ZipEntry that it already has open behind the scenes)
library?
--
Mark Raynsford | http://www.io7m.com
y to hide modules that you aren't overriding.
OK, thanks!
It occurs to me that I'm essentially trying to do the work that the
SecurityManager would have done in the past: Restrict access to
packages (or in this case, entire modules).
--
Mark Raynsford | http://www.io7m.com
and came up
with the following:
https://github.com/io7m/moduledemo-20171201/blob/master/src/main/java/com/io7m/moduledemo/WhitelistModuleDemo.java
However, the boot_layer.defineModulesWithOneLoader() call raises an
exception: "Class loader must be the boot class loader". Clearl
scheme-for-naming-stored-modules-classes-and-resources
Ah, thanks! I hadn't seen this. Looks like exactly what I need.
--
Mark Raynsford | http://www.io7m.com
n't future-proof. My tool is only
designed to work with JDK 9 and up.
Note that I'm *not* asking to get from loaded Class instances to
bytes: I'm analyzing classes statically and none of the analyzed
classes will actually be loaded by any ClassLoader.
--
Mark Raynsford | http://www.io7m.com
14 matches
Mail list logo
