We don't need more proposals how to solve the problem.
We need agreement that we have a problem!
Stephan
On 12.06.2017 23:31, Ralph Goers wrote:
I had this same thought a week or so ago and I wouldn’t be surprised to see
someone create a framework that generates a module-info.java from annotat
I had this same thought a week or so ago and I wouldn’t be surprised to see
someone create a framework that generates a module-info.java from annotations.
But that doesn’t solve the issues I have hit, which all stem from
module-info.class conflicting with pre-java 9 tools. Frankly, I don’t know
Hi Markus,
- Mail original -
> De: "Markus Keller"
> À: jigsaw-dev@openjdk.java.net
> Cc: "Daniel Megert"
> Envoyé: Lundi 12 Juin 2017 15:26:10
> Objet: Annotation-based syntax for module-info.java
> [I know this is coming way too late, and my r
2017/6/12 6:26:10 -0700, markus_kel...@ch.ibm.com:
> [I know this is coming way too late, and my recent accident that
> incapacitated me for several week didn't help either. Nevertheless, I
> think the current module-info.java syntax was a snap decision that should
> not end up in the Java 9 spe
[I know this is coming way too late, and my recent accident that
incapacitated me for several week didn't help either. Nevertheless, I
think the current module-info.java syntax was a snap decision that should
not end up in the Java 9 spec.]
The discussions about restricted keywords
http://openj
