On 13/10/2018 08:54, Alex Sviridov wrote:
:
I am sorry, maybe I didn't express this very clear: I mean something like this:
ModuleLayer layer = parent.defineModulesWithOneLoader(cf, scl, args); Where
args are for example String[] and we pass the same --add-exports, --add-opens,
--patch-module
Суббота, 13 октября 2018, 10:43 +03:00 от Alan Bateman
:
>
>On 12/10/2018 21:57, Alex Sviridov wrote:
>> Hi Alan,
>>
>> Thank you for detailed explanation. It is great that we have API that allows
>> to implement
>> such features. However, what I suggest is a little different. I am speaking
>> a
On 12/10/2018 21:57, Alex Sviridov wrote:
Hi Alan,
Thank you for detailed explanation. It is great that we have API that allows to
implement
such features. However, what I suggest is a little different. I am speaking
about using
existing code for such features.
I think this way - firstly, we
Hi Alan,
Thank you for detailed explanation. It is great that we have API that allows to
implement
such features. However, what I suggest is a little different. I am speaking
about using
existing code for such features.
I think this way - firstly, we can do write the same code many times. We
On 12/10/2018 16:00, Alex Sviridov wrote:
I am speaking not only about patch-module but about all possible options:
--add-exports, --add-opens, --patch-module, --add-modules, --add-reads etc.
ModuleLayer defines static variants of the defineModuleXXX methods that
return a Controller object that
I am speaking not only about patch-module but about all possible options:
--add-exports, --add-opens, --patch-module, --add-modules, --add-reads etc.
Agree that "custom" support for them is not a good way.
Alex
>Пятница, 12 октября 2018, 17:50 +03:00 от Alan Bateman
>:
>
>On 12/10/2018 13:16
On 12/10/2018 13:16, Alex Sviridov wrote:
Hi Alan
Maybe it is necessary to add possibility to have equal control for boot layer
and
other layers. Because layers are graph but at this moment we can do for boot
layer
more then for others -> if we work with non boot layers we must use another
sol
Hi Alan
Maybe it is necessary to add possibility to have equal control for boot layer
and
other layers. Because layers are graph but at this moment we can do for boot
layer
more then for others -> if we work with non boot layers we must use another
solutions -> different solutions within one te
On 11/10/2018 10:57, Alex Sviridov wrote:
Hi all,
I create ModuleLayer this way
ModuleFinder finder = ModuleFinder.of(dir1, dir2, dir3);
ModuleLayer parent = ModuleLayer.boot();
Configuration cf = parent.configuration().resolve(finder, ModuleFinder.of(),
Set.of("myapp"));
ClassLoader scl = Cla
Hi all,
I create ModuleLayer this way
ModuleFinder finder = ModuleFinder.of(dir1, dir2, dir3);
ModuleLayer parent = ModuleLayer.boot();
Configuration cf = parent.configuration().resolve(finder, ModuleFinder.of(),
Set.of("myapp"));
ClassLoader scl = ClassLoader.getSystemClassLoader();
ModuleLayer
10 matches
Mail list logo
