- Mail original -
> De: "Robert Scholte"
> À: "Remi Forax"
> Cc: jigsaw-dev@openjdk.java.net
> Envoyé: Dimanche 26 Mars 2017 11:46:40
> Objet: Re: Progress report on SLF4J project modularization
> Hi Rémi,
caveat: i'm not fully competent he
e of javac changes the way a synthetic
class is named (you will have the two versions with the compiler plugin).
cheers,
Rémi
- Mail original -
De: "Robert Scholte"
À: jigsaw-dev@openjdk.java.net
Envoyé: Samedi 25 Mars 2017 18:56:50
Objet: Re: Progress report on SLF4J project modu
e two versions with the compiler plugin).
cheers,
Rémi
- Mail original -
> De: "Robert Scholte"
> À: jigsaw-dev@openjdk.java.net
> Envoyé: Samedi 25 Mars 2017 18:56:50
> Objet: Re: Progress report on SLF4J project modularization
> On Sat, 25 Mar 2017 15:
Parts of this feel like a health care act...
Gregg
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 24, 2017, at 2:33 PM, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 3/24/2017 19:28, David M. Lloyd wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ceki, we came up with an approach that works for us (though it's a
>> bit cumbersome). See: http://word-bits.f
On Sat, 25 Mar 2017 15:38:27 +0100, Ceki Gulcu wrote:
Following the recipe at [2], it all seems to work.
Good to read that the recipe works. If we need to add things to this
recipe to improve it, just let me know.
Although in general I don't think we'll be helping developers if we show
th
Hi Alan,
Following the recipe at [2], it all seems to work.
After modularizing the SLF4J project under Java9/Maven I tried to have
the project compile for Java 6 (except modules-info.java) and have
modules-info.java compile with Java 9.
Trying a MR-JAR approach, I got very confused when I coul
On 25/03/2017 08:04, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
:
Right, project code does not have anything Java9 specific except
module-info.class.
So if I understand correctly, source code except module-info.java
would need to be compiled targeting an older java version, say 1.6,
and module-info.java would be c
On 3/25/2017 8:47, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 24/03/2017 17:41, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
Hi All,
The initial phase of SLF4J project modularization in preparation for
Java 9/Jigsaw went well. I ran into many wrinkles most of which were
due to my own ignorance about Java 9 modules.
You can see the resu
On 24/03/2017 17:41, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
Hi All,
The initial phase of SLF4J project modularization in preparation for
Java 9/Jigsaw went well. I ran into many wrinkles most of which were
due to my own ignorance about Java 9 modules.
You can see the results at
https://github.com/qos-ch/slf4j/tr
On 3/24/2017 1:12 PM, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
To be more precise, I am trying to have a single jar file which will
be seen as modular on Java 9 and as a regular jar in older JVMs,
with module-info.class ignored.
Isn't that just the first two javac invocations in Alan's mail at
http://mail.openjdk.ja
On 03/24/2017 02:33 PM, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
On 3/24/2017 19:28, David M. Lloyd wrote:
Hi Ceki, we came up with an approach that works for us (though it's a
bit cumbersome). See: http://word-bits.flurg.com/multrelease-jars/
Hi David,
Thanks for the pointer. I am trying to compile modules-in
Hi David,
I tried to port your approach to apply to the SLF4J Project, but due my lack of
Maven experience it was doomed to fail. Seems, that a small contribution would
be very welcome :-)
Cheers Patrick
> Am 24.03.2017 um 19:28 schrieb David M. Lloyd :
>
> On 03/24/2017 12:41 PM, Ceki Gülcü
On 3/24/2017 20:33, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
On 3/24/2017 19:28, David M. Lloyd wrote:
Hi Ceki, we came up with an approach that works for us (though it's a
bit cumbersome). See: http://word-bits.flurg.com/multrelease-jars/
To be more precise, I am trying to have a single jar file which will
b
On 3/24/2017 19:28, David M. Lloyd wrote:
Hi Ceki, we came up with an approach that works for us (though it's a
bit cumbersome). See: http://word-bits.flurg.com/multrelease-jars/
Hi David,
Thanks for the pointer. I am trying to compile modules-info.java
selectively which seems to be a mu
On 03/24/2017 12:41 PM, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
Hi All,
The initial phase of SLF4J project modularization in preparation for
Java 9/Jigsaw went well. I ran into many wrinkles most of which were
due to my own ignorance about Java 9 modules.
You can see the results at
https://github.com/qos-ch/slf4j/
Hi All,
The initial phase of SLF4J project modularization in preparation for
Java 9/Jigsaw went well. I ran into many wrinkles most of which were
due to my own ignorance about Java 9 modules.
You can see the results at
https://github.com/qos-ch/slf4j/tree/1_8_0-SNAPSHOT
Now that the initial p
16 matches
Mail list logo
