> Am 13.11.2015 um 19:43 schrieb Mandy Chung :
>
>> On Nov 13, 2015, at 1:03 AM, Patrick Reinhart wrote:
>> but they don’t have any overlapped class.
Ah, I was thinking it that direction, but I was not absolutely sure. Thanks for
clarification.
On 11/12/2015 06:49 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
On Nov 12, 2015, at 2:39 AM, Patrick Reinhart wrote:
Hi there,
I like to do some early adoption tests with software using the new module
system. Now we got an unknown amount of split packages in our system, the we
will need to
> Am 13.11.2015 um 03:49 schrieb Mandy Chung :
>
>> On Nov 12, 2015, at 2:39 AM, Patrick Reinhart wrote:
>>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I like to do some early adoption tests with software using the new module
>> system. Now we got an unknown amount of split
> Am 13.11.2015 um 09:20 schrieb Alan Bateman :
>
> On 13/11/2015 03:49, Mandy Chung wrote:
>> :
>> A tool to detect split packages and some other characteristics to aid
>> migration to modules would be useful. I tend to think that belongs to a
>> different tool that
On 13/11/2015 03:49, Mandy Chung wrote:
:
A tool to detect split packages and some other characteristics to aid
migration to modules would be useful. I tend to think that belongs to
a different tool that can build other additional analysis in it.
I was chatting briefly with Patrick about this
Hi there,
I like to do some early adoption tests with software using the new module
system. Now we got an unknown amount of split packages in our system, the we
will need to fix in order to migrate our codebase.
I could imagine, that there are other potential users of the JDK, that have the
> On Nov 12, 2015, at 2:39 AM, Patrick Reinhart wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> I like to do some early adoption tests with software using the new module
> system. Now we got an unknown amount of split packages in our system, the we
> will need to fix in order to migrate our