Hi Claes,
The changes look good.
Could you run the RBT hs nightly tests against the Linux-x64 platform
before pushing this change?
Thanks, Harold
On 1/6/2017 9:35 AM, Claes Redestad wrote:
Hi Harold,
sure, I've updated the patch in-place with this small improvement and
submitted a new
On 1/9/17 04:16, Claes Redestad wrote:
Hi Serguei,
On 2017-01-09 09:11, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Claes,
It looks pretty good.
thanks,
One question on the following fragment:
Hi Serguei,
On 2017-01-09 09:11, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Claes,
It looks pretty good.
thanks,
One question on the following fragment:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8171855/jdk.04/src/java.base/share/native/libjava/Module.c.udiff.html
+ int valid = 1;
+ for (idx = 0;
Hi Claes,
It looks pretty good.
One question on the following fragment:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8171855/jdk.04/src/java.base/share/native/libjava/Module.c.udiff.html
+ int valid = 1;
+ for (idx = 0; idx < num_packages; idx++) {
+ jstring pkg = (*env)->GetObjectArrayElement(env,
Hi Harold,
sure, I've updated the patch in-place with this small improvement and
submitted a new set of tests.
/Claes
On 2017-01-06 14:23, harold seigel wrote:
Hi Claes,
One small nit. In these lines in modules.cpp, the length of
package_name at line 305 could be saved in a local and then
On 2017-01-06 15:07, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 06/01/2017 13:18, Claes Redestad wrote:
:
Updated jdk webrev in-place:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8171855/jdk.04/
I looked through the latest webrev and it looks quite good. Part of me
regrets introducing JNI code of course but this is
On 06/01/2017 13:18, Claes Redestad wrote:
:
Updated jdk webrev in-place:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8171855/jdk.04/
I looked through the latest webrev and it looks quite good. Part of me
regrets introducing JNI code of course but this is startup motivated.
In Module.c then I
Hi Peter,
On 2017-01-06 09:46, Peter Levart wrote:
Hi Claes,
On 01/06/2017 03:36 AM, Claes Redestad wrote:
New webrevs:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8171855/hotspot.04/
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8171855/jdk.04/
In Module.c, it seems you applied the "techinique" of
Hi Claes,
On 01/06/2017 03:36 AM, Claes Redestad wrote:
New webrevs:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8171855/hotspot.04/
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8171855/jdk.04/
In Module.c, it seems you applied the "techinique" of conditional
allocation (lines 49...57), but forgot to
Lois, Mandy,
On 2017-01-05 22:19, Lois Foltan wrote:
>
> On 1/5/2017 11:47 AM, Claes Redestad wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> after a round of review comments I've now reworked this to do the
>> transformations in the JNI layer rather than inside the VM, with
>> similar - if not better - results.
>>
>>
> On Jan 5, 2017, at 8:47 AM, Claes Redestad wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> after a round of review comments I've now reworked this to do the
> transformations in the JNI layer rather than inside the VM, with
> similar - if not better - results.
>
> Webrevs:
>
On 1/5/2017 11:47 AM, Claes Redestad wrote:
Hi,
after a round of review comments I've now reworked this to do the
transformations in the JNI layer rather than inside the VM, with
similar - if not better - results.
Webrevs:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8171855/hotspot.03/
Hi,
after a round of review comments I've now reworked this to do the
transformations in the JNI layer rather than inside the VM, with
similar - if not better - results.
Webrevs:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8171855/hotspot.03/
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8171855/jdk.03/
13 matches
Mail list logo