On 05/16/2016 12:36 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
>For tests then Jon will be pushing the updated MineField to jdk9/dev soon. We
need to go over the new options and get javac and the runtime consistent. I think
we want it so that empty elements in the new options are ignored, leaving class
path for
> On May 16, 2016, at 11:53 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>
>
> Martin's MineField test has been excluded for some time, one reason is that
> it exercised -Xbootclasspath/p and so doesn't work with JDK 9. Jon is
> cleaning up this test via JDK-8156989 and lo behold, it finds a corner case.
>
> The
