On 30.05.2017 23:43, Alex Buckley wrote:
On 5/30/2017 2:08 PM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
On 30.05.2017 21:42, Alex Buckley wrote:
On 5/26/2017 4:12 AM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
On 26.05.2017 01:04, Alex Buckley wrote: [...]
The semantics of an observed JAR without module-info.class are
specifie
ok, thanks for the answers
On 30.05.2017 23:43, Alex Buckley wrote:
On 5/30/2017 2:08 PM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
On 30.05.2017 21:42, Alex Buckley wrote:
On 5/26/2017 4:12 AM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
On 26.05.2017 01:04, Alex Buckley wrote: [...]
The semantics of an observed JAR without mod
On 5/30/2017 2:08 PM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
On 30.05.2017 21:42, Alex Buckley wrote:
On 5/26/2017 4:12 AM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
On 26.05.2017 01:04, Alex Buckley wrote: [...]
The semantics of an observed JAR without module-info.class are
specified as part of JPMS resolution, and JLS 7.3
On 30.05.2017 21:42, Alex Buckley wrote:
On 5/26/2017 4:12 AM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
On 26.05.2017 01:04, Alex Buckley wrote:
[...]
The semantics of an observed JAR without module-info.class are specified
as part of JPMS resolution, and JLS 7.3 explicitly defers to that, so I
believe it is
On 5/26/2017 4:12 AM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
On 26.05.2017 01:04, Alex Buckley wrote:
[...]
The semantics of an observed JAR without module-info.class are specified
as part of JPMS resolution, and JLS 7.3 explicitly defers to that, so I
believe it is clear how a compiler must behave when a modu
On 26.05.2017 01:04, Alex Buckley wrote:
[...]
The semantics of an observed JAR without module-info.class are specified
as part of JPMS resolution, and JLS 7.3 explicitly defers to that, so I
believe it is clear how a compiler must behave when a modular
compilation unit 'requires' a module that t
On 5/23/2017 1:47 PM, Stephan Herrmann wrote:
On 23.05.2017 22:30, Alex Buckley wrote:
Automatic modules are not a source artifact, so their specification is
found in the API portion of the JPMS spec rather than in the JLS. The
JLS has traditionally not specified how a compiler interprets
non-so
On 23.05.2017 22:30, Alex Buckley wrote:
On 5/23/2017 12:54 PM, Stephan Herrmann wrote:
The 2017-05-18 draft of JLS indicates that automatic modules are beyond the
scope of JLS.
I'm puzzled what that should mean for a compiler.
At face value it seems to say that compilers need not care about aut
On 5/23/2017 12:54 PM, Stephan Herrmann wrote:
The 2017-05-18 draft of JLS indicates that automatic modules are beyond the
scope of JLS.
I'm puzzled what that should mean for a compiler.
At face value it seems to say that compilers need not care about automatic
modules. Instead I'd expect JLS to
