On 08/06/2016 10:16, Michael Musgrove wrote:
I have followed your (and Andrew's) advice and patched the java.corba
module and updated my maven poms to use the patch and made good
progress as a result, so thanks for your help here.
I do have another potential blocker: this time I (or rather
On 23/05/2016 15:52, Andrew Dinn wrote:
:
Thanks to you and Sanders for the advice. The relevant packages now appear.
Could you explain how the disabled status of this module is arrived at
in the final build? Is it excluded from the standard visible set by
virtue of being listed in UPGRADEABLE_
Hi Alan,
On 23/05/16 14:27, Alan Bateman wrote:
> As Sander said, compiling with `-addmods java.corba` will ensure that
> the java.corba module is resolved.
Thanks to you and Sanders for the advice. The relevant packages now appear.
Could you explain how the disabled status of this module is arr
On 23/05/2016 13:51, Andrew Dinn wrote:
Hi All,
Red Hat's Transactions developers are having problems compiling their
Corba-based code using the latest early access release of JDK9
(9-ea-b119). When the maven compiler plugin executes javac the compile
fails because various corba packages are n
Hi Andrew, Michael,
It's come up several times recently on this list, but this should clear up the
issue: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk9-dev/2016-May/004309.html
In short: use `-addmods java.corba` when compiling as of 9-ea-b119.
Sander
On 23 May 2016, at 14:51, Andrew Dinn
mail
