On 13/10/2016 21:43, Andrew Dinn wrote:
:
I am aware that the code I add to the bootstrap can only rely on a core
subset of the JDK runtime classes being available. That ought not to be
an issue -- I have deliberately kept the agent's footprint as small as
possible because every time Byteman use
On 13/10/16 18:27, Alan Bateman wrote:
> What you see is deliberate. It wouldn't be impossible for the boot
> loader to support MR JARs but it hardly seems worth the complexity. One
> reason is that it's not a common way to deploy a general purpose
> library. Even if it were then it would be proble
On 13/10/2016 17:40, Andrew Dinn wrote:
:
A Few Questions:
Am I right that this is a deliberate choice of bootstrap loader
behaviour? Or is there perhaps some other bug here?
If this is a deliberate choice is there any possibility of reviewing it?
Would it be particularly difficult to modif