: "John Rose" , "Alan Bateman"
>
> Cc: "Rémi Forax" , "jigsaw-dev"
>
> Envoyé: Samedi 23 Juillet 2016 08:59:49
> Objet: Re: creating proxies for interfaces with default methods
> On 23.07.2016 01:12, John Rose wrote:
>> On May 27, 2016
On 23/07/2016 00:12, John Rose wrote:
The Lookup API does not have a "setAccessible" analog.
Maybe it should; along the lines of Unsafe.privateLookup(Class).
Would this be the internal Unsafe or sun.misc.Unsafe? I just wonder if
this is something that would be regretted in the future.
For t
On 23.07.2016 01:12, John Rose wrote:
On May 27, 2016, at 1:16 AM, Alan Bateman mailto:alan.bate...@oracle.com>> wrote:
I don't think it's possible to create a Lookup via support API with
just the PRIVATE lookup mode. It only seems to work because this code
seems to hack into the non-public con
On May 27, 2016, at 1:16 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>
> I don't think it's possible to create a Lookup via support API with just the
> PRIVATE lookup mode. It only seems to work because this code seems to hack
> into the non-public constructor. I'm curious if you invoke toString on this,
> with J
On 27/05/2016 06:28, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
:
MethodHandles.Lookup.class.getDeclaredConstructor(Class.class,
int.class).
newInstance(interfaceClass, MethodHandles.Lookup.PRIVATE).
unreflectSpecial(method, interfaceClass).
bindTo(receiver);
but that is not working anymore.
On 27.05.2016 08:58, fo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote:
- Mail original -
De: "Jochen Theodorou"
À: "Remi Forax"
Cc: "jigsaw-dev"
Envoyé: Vendredi 27 Mai 2016 07:28:58
Objet: Re: creating proxies for interfaces with default methods
On 26.05.2016 14:00, Rem
- Mail original -
> De: "Jochen Theodorou"
> À: "Remi Forax"
> Cc: "jigsaw-dev"
> Envoyé: Vendredi 27 Mai 2016 07:28:58
> Objet: Re: creating proxies for interfaces with default methods
>
> On 26.05.2016 14:00, Remi Forax wrote:
>
On 26.05.2016 14:00, Remi Forax wrote:
Not if you use Lookup.findSpecial() [1]
Anyway, you can not use it because you can not get the Lookup object associated
with the proxy class.
which is why I did this:
MethodHandles.Lookup.class.getDeclaredConstructor(Class.class, int.class).
ss%29
[2] https://github.com/forax/proxy2
- Mail original -
> De: "Jochen Theodorou"
> À: "Alan Bateman"
> Cc: "jigsaw-dev"
> Envoyé: Jeudi 26 Mai 2016 09:21:15
> Objet: Re: creating proxies for interfaces with default methods
>
> On 26.
On 26.05.2016 09:03, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 26/05/2016 07:04, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
you cannot invoke the default method with reflection without
implementation of the interface
It sounds like you want to invoke the default method without a receiver.
This does seem like sorcery for mlvm-dev.
On 26/05/2016 07:04, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
you cannot invoke the default method with reflection without
implementation of the interface
It sounds like you want to invoke the default method without a receiver.
This does seem like sorcery for mlvm-dev.
-Alan
On 25.05.2016 22:32, Mandy Chung wrote:
On May 25, 2016, at 1:12 PM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
Dynamic proxies and invocation handlers won't do the job, as they do not
provide an implementation of the interface I can call the default method
on.
Is this a general limitation of j.l.r.Proxy? At
> On May 25, 2016, at 1:12 PM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
>
>>> Dynamic proxies and invocation handlers won't do the job, as they do not
>>> provide an implementation of the interface I can call the default method
>>> on.
>>
>> Is this a general limitation of j.l.r.Proxy? At first glance it doesn'
On 25.05.2016 20:08, Alex Buckley wrote:
On 5/25/2016 12:22 AM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
so in earlier mails to this list I described a bit the problems I got
into with the way Groovy produces proxies and handles default methods
for those.
Pointer? The most relevant thread I could find was "Gro
On 5/25/2016 12:22 AM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
so in earlier mails to this list I described a bit the problems I got
into with the way Groovy produces proxies and handles default methods
for those.
Pointer? The most relevant thread I could find was "Groovy with Jigsaw"
from September 2015 but
15 matches
Mail list logo
