On 30/09/16 15:11, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> Hi all,
> I think what Peter raises is a very interesting quandary.
>
> Without going in the syntax details of this proposal, the point is
> that implementations of "javax.persistence" (and similar APIs) need to
> advertise themselves as eligible to gett
Sanne, weak modules already allow this, but the weak module mechanism is
not adequate, as has been discussed internally.
The question of whether restricting reflection is useful or not is a
separate discussion. Our position is that it is a solution for a
problem that can be solved in other wa
Hi all,
I think what Peter raises is a very interesting quandary.
Without going in the syntax details of this proposal, the point is
that implementations of "javax.persistence" (and similar APIs) need to
advertise themselves as eligible to getting certain additional
privileges - such as reflective
