After further discussion off line we are aiming to get the fix for
JDK-8163316 into this week's build of jdk-9+134.
-- Kevin
Mandy Chung wrote:
On Aug 26, 2016, at 4:17 PM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
Hi Mandy,
How soon were you thinking to push this to 9-dev? Until we change JavaFX to use
On 27/08/2016 00:06, Mandy Chung wrote:
This patch removes the old module options from java, javac, javadoc, etc. The
new options are in jdk-9+132 [1]. I did a scan on the jdk9/dev forest to
replace any remaining reference to the old options. I find some tests in
jdk9/hs/hotspot using the
On Aug 26, 2016, at 4:17 PM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>
> Hi Mandy,
>
> How soon were you thinking to push this to 9-dev? Until we change JavaFX to
> use the new options, which is planned to go into our dev repo on Monday for
> the following week's promoted build (b135)
So JDK-8163316 does not
Looks good to me.
-- Jon
On 08/26/2016 04:06 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
This patch removes the old module options from java, javac, javadoc, etc. The
new options are in jdk-9+132 [1]. I did a scan on the jdk9/dev forest to
replace any remaining reference to the old options. I find some tests i
Hi Mandy,
How soon were you thinking to push this to 9-dev? Until we change JavaFX
to use the new options, which is planned to go into our dev repo on
Monday for the following week's promoted build (b135) so if you push the
changes to jdk9/dev before build 135 is promoted, it will break JavaFX
This patch removes the old module options from java, javac, javadoc, etc. The
new options are in jdk-9+132 [1]. I did a scan on the jdk9/dev forest to
replace any remaining reference to the old options. I find some tests in
jdk9/hs/hotspot using the old options that I will file a separate iss
