W dniu 14.10.2018 o 09:27, Alan Bateman pisze:
> On 13/10/2018 15:12, Michał Zegan wrote:
>> :
>> hmm so it is not a good idea to, say, generate a bytecode/class to be
>> defined as part of currently loaded module X by means of
>> MethodHandles.Lookup.defineClass or something like that if this b
On 13/10/2018 15:12, Michał Zegan wrote:
:
hmm so it is not a good idea to, say, generate a bytecode/class to be
defined as part of currently loaded module X by means of
MethodHandles.Lookup.defineClass or something like that if this bytecode
would have to access module Y that is currently not re
W dniu 13.10.2018 o 09:24, Alan Bateman pisze:
> On 13/10/2018 00:40, Michał Zegan wrote:
>> :
>>
>> Oh actually one question I forgot about: if I generate bytecode
>> accessing classes in modules that I don't read, and I call
>> Module.addReads on myself, I can then read the module with classes
On 13/10/2018 00:40, Michał Zegan wrote:
:
Oh actually one question I forgot about: if I generate bytecode
accessing classes in modules that I don't read, and I call
Module.addReads on myself, I can then read the module with classes I
want to access, however my module's class loader probably wil
W dniu 10.10.2018 o 22:09, Michał Zegan pisze:
>
>
> W dniu 10.10.2018 o 20:36, Alan Bateman pisze:
>> On 10/10/2018 17:43, Michał Zegan wrote:
>>> 2. What is the use for Module.addReads and
>>> ModuleLayer.Controller.addReads methods?
>> Module addReads is important when generating bytecode i
On 11.10.2018 19:57, Michał Zegan wrote:
W dniu 11.10.2018 o 19:03, Jochen Theodorou pisze:
On 10.10.2018 22:09, Michał Zegan wrote:
[...]
Oh when we are at it, a bit offtopic, can bytecode generation be
replaced with method handle usage, or method handles are still not fast
enough... or what
W dniu 11.10.2018 o 19:03, Jochen Theodorou pisze:
> On 10.10.2018 22:09, Michał Zegan wrote:
> [...]
>> Oh when we are at it, a bit offtopic, can bytecode generation be
>> replaced with method handle usage, or method handles are still not fast
>> enough... or whatever?
>
> In my experience the
On 10.10.2018 22:09, Michał Zegan wrote:
[...]
Oh when we are at it, a bit offtopic, can bytecode generation be
replaced with method handle usage, or method handles are still not fast
enough... or whatever?
In my experience they are fast enough in many, if not most cases. But if
you cannot do
W dniu 10.10.2018 o 20:36, Alan Bateman pisze:
> On 10/10/2018 17:43, Michał Zegan wrote:
>> 2. What is the use for Module.addReads and
>> ModuleLayer.Controller.addReads methods?
> Module addReads is important when generating bytecode in your own module
> with references to classes in modules t
On 10/10/2018 17:43, Michał Zegan wrote:
2. What is the use for Module.addReads and
ModuleLayer.Controller.addReads methods?
Module addReads is important when generating bytecode in your own module
with references to classes in modules that you don't read. Another
example is where you create m
Hello,
I have following 2 questions:
1. Reflection and MethodHandles throw exceptions deriving from
java.lang.ReflectiveOperationException, that are checked exceptions.
However, the whole module related api throws unchecked exceptions. What
is the actual reason/motivation for using unchecked except
11 matches
Mail list logo
