Re: Extending java.base module

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Volker Simonis wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Alan Bateman wrote: > > On 15/02/2017 16:01, Daniel Fuchs wrote: > > > >> > >> In that specific case it's not java.base that depends > >> on

Re: Extending java.base module

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Alan Bateman wrote: > On 15/02/2017 16:01, Daniel Fuchs wrote: > >> >> In that specific case it's not java.base that depends >> on java.security.jgss, but the application itself. >> >> So I would expect the application code to either

Re: Extending java.base module

On 15/02/2017 16:01, Daniel Fuchs wrote: In that specific case it's not java.base that depends on java.security.jgss, but the application itself. So I would expect the application code to either require java.security.jgss, or some higher level module for that itself requires

Re: Extending java.base module

Hi Volker, On 15/02/17 15:52, Volker Simonis wrote: Hi Max, I'm not an jigsaw either, but wouldn't your solution break a tool like jlink? In other words, if an application uses your code and the developer uses jlink to create a run-time image, wouldn't that image fail to execute his

Re: Extending java.base module

Hi Max, I'm not an jigsaw either, but wouldn't your solution break a tool like jlink? In other words, if an application uses your code and the developer uses jlink to create a run-time image, wouldn't that image fail to execute his application because jlink fails to see that java.base depends on

Re: Extending java.base module

> > E.g. if I need to register/reach my service already at the early stages of > JVM initialization, e.g. when a class java.lang.Thread gets initialized, > can I assume a service from my extension module would be available? > No. At that time only java.base classes can be loaded. If you look at

Re: Extending java.base module

On 15/02/2017 12:10, David Holmes wrote: On 15/02/2017 8:03 PM, Langer, Christoph wrote: Hi Chris, Max, thanks for your quick answers. So the service approach seems to fit quite well. But can I assume that my service implementation will be available already at "bootstrap time" of the

Re: Extending java.base module

sap.com>; jigsaw- d...@openjdk.java.net Subject: Re: Extending java.base module On 15 Feb 2017, at 08:51, Weijun Wang <weijun.w...@oracle.com> wrote: Disclaimer: I am not a jigsaw expert. The provides/uses mechanism is certainly more formal, but you can also do http://hg.openjdk.java.net/j

Re: Extending java.base module

On 15/02/2017 08:36, Langer, Christoph wrote: Hi Jigsaw experts, as you might or might not know, we have an own JDK implementation with some extension code that is quite interwoven with the jdk. Now I'm looking into how this coding can be spread into a good module structure for jdk9. And

RE: Extending java.base module

Weijun Wang <weijun.w...@oracle.com> > Cc: Langer, Christoph <christoph.lan...@sap.com>; jigsaw- > d...@openjdk.java.net > Subject: Re: Extending java.base module > > > > On 15 Feb 2017, at 08:51, Weijun Wang <weijun.w...@oracle.com> wrote: > >

Re: Extending java.base module

> On 15 Feb 2017, at 08:51, Weijun Wang wrote: > > Disclaimer: I am not a jigsaw expert. > > The provides/uses mechanism is certainly more formal, but you can also do > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/d282c1a8d20b. This is, at best, a hack. The use of

Re: Extending java.base module

Disclaimer: I am not a jigsaw expert. The provides/uses mechanism is certainly more formal, but you can also do http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/d282c1a8d20b. --Max On 02/15/2017 04:36 PM, Langer, Christoph wrote: Hi Jigsaw experts, as you might or might not know, we have an own