On 16/09/2016 08:36, David M. Lloyd wrote:
OK. For this issue though, would it not make sense to look at the
null parent class loader case in a specific and separate way: in the
past, such class loaders had access to all platform classes, so as a
compatibility factor it would not be unreaso
On 09/16/2016 10:30 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 16/09/2016 07:21, David M. Lloyd wrote:
Hi Alan,
In JDK-8161269 you said [1] that the "null" class loader has never
been specified to contain all Java SE types, using this as a
justification to reject this issue as "Not an Issue", regardless of
th
On 16/09/2016 07:21, David M. Lloyd wrote:
Hi Alan,
In JDK-8161269 you said [1] that the "null" class loader has never
been specified to contain all Java SE types, using this as a
justification to reject this issue as "Not an Issue", regardless of
the compatibility impact (particularly the c
