hudeqi commented on PR #13348:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13348#issuecomment-1471469700
> > In addition, does this repair need to open a new jira?
>
> In fact, we should revert this PR first. The solution offered by this PR
bring antoher issue (thanks to @robobario). Th
hudeqi commented on PR #13348:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13348#issuecomment-1471460665
>
> > If all variables are volatile or atomic, will it affect the printing
performance of this perf program?
>
> Or we just handle the `iteration` as it seems `iterat
hudeqi commented on PR #13348:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13348#issuecomment-1471428193
> > Maybe my thread safety explanation is incorrect, I'll look again
tomorrow.
>
> the thread safety explanation is correct to me. My point was that we
should not only fix `iteratio
hudeqi commented on PR #13348:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13348#issuecomment-1471416257
>
In fact, I also have this question. The variables in stats are all
thread-unsafe at present, but the printed data looks fine😂, and this is a
probabilistic problem for the version
hudeqi commented on PR #13348:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13348#issuecomment-1471374895
> Hi, I think this introduced a race condition that can cause the
producer-perf-test to log a lot of exceptions to console if num records >
50. Since the `iteration` is incremented fro
hudeqi commented on PR #13348:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13348#issuecomment-1470060354
Thx, Is this
[KIP](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-842%3A+Add+richer+group+offset+reset+mechanisms)
interested in understanding and discussing? @chia7712 @showuon
hudeqi commented on PR #13348:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13348#issuecomment-1463470303
>
Hello, the relevant test code has been submitted, please help to review,
thank you. @showuon
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the mes
hudeqi commented on PR #13348:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13348#issuecomment-1463200864
> @hudeqi , thanks for the patch. This change makes sense to me. Could you
add tests for this change?
Do you want to add test screenshots/results for this case, or the test code
cor
hudeqi commented on PR #13348:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13348#issuecomment-1463199545
> >
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubs
hudeqi commented on PR #13348:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13348#issuecomment-1463199231
>
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubsc
hudeqi commented on PR #13348:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13348#issuecomment-1458087082
Can someone take a look?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific commen
11 matches
Mail list logo