Re: [PR] KAFKA-16222: KRaft Migration: Incorrect default user-principal quota after migration [kafka]

2024-03-20 Thread via GitHub
showuon commented on PR #15481: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15481#issuecomment-2008904600 Backedport to 3.7 and 3.6. @omkreddy , FYI. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go

Re: [PR] KAFKA-16222: KRaft Migration: Incorrect default user-principal quota after migration [kafka]

2024-03-20 Thread via GitHub
showuon merged PR #15481: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15481 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [PR] KAFKA-16222: KRaft Migration: Incorrect default user-principal quota after migration [kafka]

2024-03-20 Thread via GitHub
showuon commented on PR #15481: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15481#issuecomment-2008777656 Failed tests are unrelated. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific

Re: [PR] KAFKA-16222: KRaft Migration: Incorrect default user-principal quota after migration [kafka]

2024-03-19 Thread via GitHub
omkreddy commented on PR #15481: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15481#issuecomment-2008684718 @showuon Can we merge the PR? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the

Re: [PR] KAFKA-16222: KRaft Migration: Incorrect default user-principal quota after migration [kafka]

2024-03-18 Thread via GitHub
omkreddy commented on PR #15481: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15481#issuecomment-2005776638 I am including this to 3.6.2 release plan -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to

Re: [PR] KAFKA-16222: KRaft Migration: Incorrect default user-principal quota after migration [kafka]

2024-03-18 Thread via GitHub
showuon commented on PR #15481: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15481#issuecomment-2005672241 Re-triggering the CI build. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific

Re: [PR] KAFKA-16222: KRaft Migration: Incorrect default user-principal quota after migration [kafka]

2024-03-07 Thread via GitHub
FrankYang0529 commented on code in PR #15481: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15481#discussion_r1516093537 ## core/src/test/scala/integration/kafka/zk/ZkMigrationIntegrationTest.scala: ## @@ -271,6 +273,9 @@ class ZkMigrationIntegrationTest { assertEquals(10,

Re: [PR] KAFKA-16222: KRaft Migration: Incorrect default user-principal quota after migration [kafka]

2024-03-06 Thread via GitHub
showuon commented on PR #15481: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15481#issuecomment-1982498719 Also, please add some test cases for client and IP cases with sanitized strings. Thanks. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please

Re: [PR] KAFKA-16222: KRaft Migration: Incorrect default user-principal quota after migration [kafka]

2024-03-06 Thread via GitHub
showuon commented on code in PR #15481: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15481#discussion_r1515554131 ## core/src/test/scala/integration/kafka/zk/ZkMigrationIntegrationTest.scala: ## @@ -271,6 +273,9 @@ class ZkMigrationIntegrationTest { assertEquals(10,

[PR] KAFKA-16222: KRaft Migration: Incorrect default user-principal quota after migration [kafka]

2024-03-06 Thread via GitHub
FrankYang0529 opened a new pull request, #15481: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15481 *More detailed description of your change, if necessary. The PR title and PR message become the squashed commit message, so use a separate comment to ping reviewers.* *Summary of