[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Arpit Goyal reassigned KAFKA-15388:
-----------------------------------

    Assignee: Arpit Goyal

> Handle topics that were having compaction as retention earlier are changed to 
> delete only retention policy and onboarded to tiered storage. 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-15388
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15388
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Satish Duggana
>            Assignee: Arpit Goyal
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 3.7.0
>
>
> Context: [https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13561#discussion_r1300055517]
>  
> There are 3 paths I looked at:
>  * When data is moved to remote storage (1)
>  * When data is read from remote storage (2)
>  * When data is deleted from remote storage (3)
> (1) Does not have a problem with compacted topics. Compacted segments are 
> uploaded and their metadata claims they contain offset from the baseOffset of 
> the segment until the next segment's baseOffset. There are no gaps in offsets.
> (2) Does not have a problem if a customer is querying offsets which do not 
> exist within a segment, but there are offset after the queried offset within 
> the same segment. *However, it does have a problem when the next available 
> offset is in a subsequent segment.*
> (3) For data deleted via DeleteRecords there is no problem. For data deleted 
> via retention there is no problem.
>  
> *I believe the proper solution to (2) is to make tiered storage continue 
> looking for the next greater offset in subsequent segments.*
> Steps to reproduce the issue:
> {code:java}
> // TODO (christo)
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to