[jira] [Updated] (KAFKA-4904) Performance of RocksDb with state record cache
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-4904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Guozhang Wang updated KAFKA-4904: - Fix Version/s: (was: 1.1.0) > Performance of RocksDb with state record cache > -- > > Key: KAFKA-4904 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-4904 > Project: Kafka > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: streams >Affects Versions: 0.10.2.0 >Reporter: Eno Thereska >Priority: Major > > The performance of RocksDb without any record cache is slightly better than > with the default of 10MB of the default cache. This needs investigating. It > is likely to be the case that this is not an entirely apples-to-apples > comparison since the record cache holds records for a maximum of > 'commit.time.ms', which by default is 30 seconds. So the record cache is > adding quite a bit of latency, and we know that, however documenting the > tradeoff and looking if there is any other bugs needs to be done. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (KAFKA-4904) Performance of RocksDb with state record cache
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-4904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Guozhang Wang updated KAFKA-4904: - Fix Version/s: (was: 1.0.0) 1.1.0 > Performance of RocksDb with state record cache > -- > > Key: KAFKA-4904 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-4904 > Project: Kafka > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: streams >Affects Versions: 0.10.2.0 >Reporter: Eno Thereska > Fix For: 1.1.0 > > > The performance of RocksDb without any record cache is slightly better than > with the default of 10MB of the default cache. This needs investigating. It > is likely to be the case that this is not an entirely apples-to-apples > comparison since the record cache holds records for a maximum of > 'commit.time.ms', which by default is 30 seconds. So the record cache is > adding quite a bit of latency, and we know that, however documenting the > tradeoff and looking if there is any other bugs needs to be done. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)
