[jira] [Updated] (KAFKA-5347) OutOfSequence error should be fatal

2019-02-17 Thread Matthias J. Sax (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Matthias J. Sax updated KAFKA-5347:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.2.0)

> OutOfSequence error should be fatal
> ---
>
> Key: KAFKA-5347
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5347
> Project: Kafka
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Jason Gustafson
>Assignee: Apurva Mehta
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: exactly-once
>
> If the producer sees an OutOfSequence error for a given partition, we 
> currently treat it as an abortable error. This makes some sense because 
> OutOfSequence won't prevent us from being able to send the EndTxn to abort 
> the transaction. The problem is that the producer, even after aborting, still 
> won't be able to send to the topic with an OutOfSequence. One way to deal 
> with this is to ask the user to call {{initTransactions()}} again to bump the 
> epoch, but this is a bit difficult to explain and could be dangerous since it 
> renders zombie checking less effective. Probably we should just consider 
> OutOfSequence fatal for the transactional producer.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Updated] (KAFKA-5347) OutOfSequence error should be fatal

2018-10-03 Thread Dong Lin (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Dong Lin updated KAFKA-5347:

Fix Version/s: (was: 2.1.0)
   2.2.0

> OutOfSequence error should be fatal
> ---
>
> Key: KAFKA-5347
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5347
> Project: Kafka
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Jason Gustafson
>Assignee: Apurva Mehta
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: exactly-once
> Fix For: 2.2.0
>
>
> If the producer sees an OutOfSequence error for a given partition, we 
> currently treat it as an abortable error. This makes some sense because 
> OutOfSequence won't prevent us from being able to send the EndTxn to abort 
> the transaction. The problem is that the producer, even after aborting, still 
> won't be able to send to the topic with an OutOfSequence. One way to deal 
> with this is to ask the user to call {{initTransactions()}} again to bump the 
> epoch, but this is a bit difficult to explain and could be dangerous since it 
> renders zombie checking less effective. Probably we should just consider 
> OutOfSequence fatal for the transactional producer.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Updated] (KAFKA-5347) OutOfSequence error should be fatal

2018-06-06 Thread Rajini Sivaram (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Rajini Sivaram updated KAFKA-5347:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.0)
   2.1.0

> OutOfSequence error should be fatal
> ---
>
> Key: KAFKA-5347
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5347
> Project: Kafka
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Jason Gustafson
>Assignee: Apurva Mehta
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: exactly-once
> Fix For: 2.1.0
>
>
> If the producer sees an OutOfSequence error for a given partition, we 
> currently treat it as an abortable error. This makes some sense because 
> OutOfSequence won't prevent us from being able to send the EndTxn to abort 
> the transaction. The problem is that the producer, even after aborting, still 
> won't be able to send to the topic with an OutOfSequence. One way to deal 
> with this is to ask the user to call {{initTransactions()}} again to bump the 
> epoch, but this is a bit difficult to explain and could be dangerous since it 
> renders zombie checking less effective. Probably we should just consider 
> OutOfSequence fatal for the transactional producer.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Updated] (KAFKA-5347) OutOfSequence error should be fatal

2018-02-01 Thread Damian Guy (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Damian Guy updated KAFKA-5347:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.1.0)
   1.2.0

> OutOfSequence error should be fatal
> ---
>
> Key: KAFKA-5347
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5347
> Project: Kafka
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Jason Gustafson
>Assignee: Apurva Mehta
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: exactly-once
> Fix For: 1.2.0
>
>
> If the producer sees an OutOfSequence error for a given partition, we 
> currently treat it as an abortable error. This makes some sense because 
> OutOfSequence won't prevent us from being able to send the EndTxn to abort 
> the transaction. The problem is that the producer, even after aborting, still 
> won't be able to send to the topic with an OutOfSequence. One way to deal 
> with this is to ask the user to call {{initTransactions()}} again to bump the 
> epoch, but this is a bit difficult to explain and could be dangerous since it 
> renders zombie checking less effective. Probably we should just consider 
> OutOfSequence fatal for the transactional producer.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Updated] (KAFKA-5347) OutOfSequence error should be fatal

2017-09-22 Thread Guozhang Wang (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Guozhang Wang updated KAFKA-5347:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.0.0)
   1.1.0

> OutOfSequence error should be fatal
> ---
>
> Key: KAFKA-5347
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5347
> Project: Kafka
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Jason Gustafson
>Assignee: Apurva Mehta
>  Labels: exactly-once
> Fix For: 1.1.0
>
>
> If the producer sees an OutOfSequence error for a given partition, we 
> currently treat it as an abortable error. This makes some sense because 
> OutOfSequence won't prevent us from being able to send the EndTxn to abort 
> the transaction. The problem is that the producer, even after aborting, still 
> won't be able to send to the topic with an OutOfSequence. One way to deal 
> with this is to ask the user to call {{initTransactions()}} again to bump the 
> epoch, but this is a bit difficult to explain and could be dangerous since it 
> renders zombie checking less effective. Probably we should just consider 
> OutOfSequence fatal for the transactional producer.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Updated] (KAFKA-5347) OutOfSequence error should be fatal

2017-08-16 Thread Apurva Mehta (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Apurva Mehta updated KAFKA-5347:

Fix Version/s: (was: 0.11.0.2)
   1.0.0

> OutOfSequence error should be fatal
> ---
>
> Key: KAFKA-5347
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5347
> Project: Kafka
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Jason Gustafson
>Assignee: Apurva Mehta
>  Labels: exactly-once
> Fix For: 1.0.0
>
>
> If the producer sees an OutOfSequence error for a given partition, we 
> currently treat it as an abortable error. This makes some sense because 
> OutOfSequence won't prevent us from being able to send the EndTxn to abort 
> the transaction. The problem is that the producer, even after aborting, still 
> won't be able to send to the topic with an OutOfSequence. One way to deal 
> with this is to ask the user to call {{initTransactions()}} again to bump the 
> epoch, but this is a bit difficult to explain and could be dangerous since it 
> renders zombie checking less effective. Probably we should just consider 
> OutOfSequence fatal for the transactional producer.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Updated] (KAFKA-5347) OutOfSequence error should be fatal

2017-08-16 Thread Ismael Juma (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Ismael Juma updated KAFKA-5347:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.11.0.1)
   0.11.0.2

> OutOfSequence error should be fatal
> ---
>
> Key: KAFKA-5347
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5347
> Project: Kafka
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Jason Gustafson
>Assignee: Apurva Mehta
>  Labels: exactly-once
> Fix For: 0.11.0.2
>
>
> If the producer sees an OutOfSequence error for a given partition, we 
> currently treat it as an abortable error. This makes some sense because 
> OutOfSequence won't prevent us from being able to send the EndTxn to abort 
> the transaction. The problem is that the producer, even after aborting, still 
> won't be able to send to the topic with an OutOfSequence. One way to deal 
> with this is to ask the user to call {{initTransactions()}} again to bump the 
> epoch, but this is a bit difficult to explain and could be dangerous since it 
> renders zombie checking less effective. Probably we should just consider 
> OutOfSequence fatal for the transactional producer.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)