[NOTICE] Jakarta development mailing lists merging on April 19th

2010-04-18 Thread Rahul Akolkar
Final notice: The existing development mailing lists for Jakarta subprojects (BCEL, BSF, Cactus, ECS, JCS, JMeter, ORO, Regexp and retired subproject Slide) are merging tomorrow, April 19th. Two new lists will be created, one for development discussions and another for notifications (such as SVN,

Re: svn commit: r904514 ...

2010-01-29 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:09 AM, wrote: > Author: sebb > Date: Fri Jan 29 15:09:58 2010 > New Revision: 904514 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=904514&view=rev > Log: > Prevent NPE in askThreadsToStop() > > Modified: >     > jakarta/jmeter/trunk/src/core/org/apache/jmeter/engine/Standar

[NOTICE] Jakarta development mailing lists merging

2009-11-16 Thread Rahul Akolkar
The existing development mailing lists for Jakarta subprojects (BCEL, BSF, Cactus, ECS, JCS, JMeter, ORO, Regexp and retired subproject Slide) are merging. Two new lists will be soon be created, one for development discussions and another for notifications (such as SVN, Bugzilla, JIRA, Gump). Subs

[RESULT][VOTE] Merge dev lists

2009-10-24 Thread Rahul Akolkar
[Relaying result to all lists] The vote to merge dev lists at Jakarta has passed with the following binding votes cast: 5 +1s: Felipe Leme Daniel Savarese Vadim Gritsenko Rahul Akolkar Stephen Colebourne 2 +0s: Sebastian Bazley Rony Flatscher 2 -1s: Thomas Vandahl Torsten

[VOTE] Merge dev lists

2009-10-19 Thread Rahul Akolkar
[Suggestion is to please reply to the gene...@jakarta list only] This is a vote to consolidate the development lists at Jakarta into one development and one notifications list. For background including timing, anticipated benefits and some discussion, see proposal [1] thread. [ ] +1 [ ] -1 While

[PROPOSAL] One development list

2009-10-09 Thread Rahul Akolkar
[Out of necessity, this is heavily cross-posted. Suggestion is to send any replies to the gene...@jakarta list only to keep any discussion in one place.] We currently have 8 active development lists at Jakarta, each devoted to a subproject. I've been subscribed to all for a while and based on my o

Re: svn commit: r816920 - in /jakarta/jmeter/trunk/lib: ./ api/ doc/

2009-09-24 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 6:38 PM, sebb wrote: > On 22/09/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 9:19 AM,   wrote: >>  > Author: sebb >>  > Date: Sat Sep 19 13:19:26 2009 >>  > New Revision: 816920 >>  > >>  > URL: http

Re: svn commit: r816920 - in /jakarta/jmeter/trunk/lib: ./ api/ doc/

2009-09-22 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 9:19 AM, wrote: > Author: sebb > Date: Sat Sep 19 13:19:26 2009 > New Revision: 816920 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=816920&view=rev > Log: > Drop jars that are downloadable elsewhere > Yes please, thanks :-) -Rahul > Removed: >    jakarta/jmeter/trunk/li

Re: svn commit: r805391

2009-08-18 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 8:44 AM, wrote: > Author: sebb > Date: Tue Aug 18 12:44:22 2009 > New Revision: 805391 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=805391&view=rev > Log: > Remove some JDK 1.3 work-rounds > > Modified: >     > jakarta/jmeter/trunk/src/components/org/apache/jmeter/visualizers/

Javadocs in SVN

2008-05-27 Thread Rahul Akolkar
Do we need to have Javadocs in SVN? They should be reproducible from source? Anyway, 145 or 243 part commits are hard to follow ;-) -Rahul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [VOTE] JMeter 2.3.2RC1

2008-05-21 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 5/21/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'd forgotten about that... > > Looking at it, this uses the Assembly plugin, which supports > EOL-transformation as part of the file collation process. I assume > this copies the files to a temporary directory for the archiver to > pick them u

Re: RC and formal releases (was: JMeter 2.3.1RC1)

2007-11-29 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 11/28/07, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 29/11/2007, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > As a separate thought, over in Commons we've mostly gone from this > > style to producing final / formal / correctly version numbered > > artif

RC and formal releases (was: JMeter 2.3.1RC1)

2007-11-28 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 11/27/07, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'll proceed with cutting a formal 2.3.1 release (same content, > updated tag & release id) shortly. [I assume it does not need another > VOTE thread?] > If you rebuild, then its best to have another vote. IIRC, you did that for v2.3. As a separa

Re: [VOTE] JMeter 2.3.1RC1

2007-11-26 Thread Rahul Akolkar
+1 Nits: * Expected the source distro to just build (setup is odd, as Hen has commented in more detail) * Jar file names are odd (for example, IMO, apache-jmeter-core-n.n.jar is better than ApacheJMeter_core.jar) * README file, licensing and legal issues section, third list item is "lib/LICENSE