Re: Question regarding NTLM
On 31 August 2011 20:40, Deepak Shetty wrote: >>According to their web page they added multiple user support back in 2007. > I only see " The code was refactored to facilitate future support of > multiple profiles and other planned extensions." - not that it actually > supports , and their config doesnt seem to indicate otherwise. Without > multiple users there isn't really a load test. And even if the proxy did support mulitple users, the load test would test the proxy+server. If there are performance problems it could be difficult to determine if the proxy is to blame rather than the server. > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Bruce Ide wrote: > >> According to their web page they added multiple user support back in 2007. >> >> It would hardly be an optimal solution, but might work as a stopgap measure >> until something else could be figured out. If I had a choice between that >> and not testing, I'd be willing to give it a shot. My methods tend to be a >> bit... unorthodox... though. >> >> -- >> Bruce Ide >> flyingrhenqu...@gmail.com >> > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-user-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-user-h...@jakarta.apache.org
Re: Question regarding NTLM
>According to their web page they added multiple user support back in 2007. I only see " The code was refactored to facilitate future support of multiple profiles and other planned extensions." - not that it actually supports , and their config doesnt seem to indicate otherwise. Without multiple users there isn't really a load test. On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Bruce Ide wrote: > According to their web page they added multiple user support back in 2007. > > It would hardly be an optimal solution, but might work as a stopgap measure > until something else could be figured out. If I had a choice between that > and not testing, I'd be willing to give it a shot. My methods tend to be a > bit... unorthodox... though. > > -- > Bruce Ide > flyingrhenqu...@gmail.com >
Re: Question regarding NTLM
According to their web page they added multiple user support back in 2007. It would hardly be an optimal solution, but might work as a stopgap measure until something else could be figured out. If I had a choice between that and not testing, I'd be willing to give it a shot. My methods tend to be a bit... unorthodox... though. -- Bruce Ide flyingrhenqu...@gmail.com
Re: Question regarding NTLM
doesnt cntlm support just a single username/password? On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Bruce Ide wrote: > There's an open source NTLM proxy, cntlm, which might let you work around > it. It wasn't terribly difficult to configure when I looked at it. Works on > UNIX too. If you're really hard up... > > -- > Bruce Ide > flyingrhenqu...@gmail.com >
Re: Question regarding NTLM
There's an open source NTLM proxy, cntlm, which might let you work around it. It wasn't terribly difficult to configure when I looked at it. Works on UNIX too. If you're really hard up... -- Bruce Ide flyingrhenqu...@gmail.com
Re: Question regarding NTLM
On 30 August 2011 19:23, Deepak Shetty wrote: > hi > seems there are some issues with HttpClient4 and NTLM > http://hc.apache.org/httpcomponents-client-ga/ntlm.html. > > You might give the sample code a try and see if it works (standalone) , and > if it does you might need to modify the Jmeter code to work with HttpClient4 The HC4 sampler in JMeter might well need tweaking to work properly with NTLM; patches welcome (via Bugzilla). It's rather difficult to test the NTLM implementation - as far as I know there are no publicly accessible servers which support NTLM authentication. If you know of one - or even a semi-public one that could be used by selected developers only - please let us know. As far as I know, the Java implementation only supports NTLM on Windows. I don't know if it supports anything other than NTLMv1. The HC3 implementation only supports NTLMv1 > regards > deepak > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Shmuel Krakower wrote: > >> Hello everybody, >> This is my first message here. >> >> I am load testing an IIS application which using NTLM to authenticate. >> I am using the latest - 2.5 JMeter and trying to use the HTTP Authorization >> Manager. >> >> Firstly - it seems like only with HttpClient3.1 Implemented HTTP Request >> the >> NTLM string is being sent (I can see it on the view results tree for the >> relevant request). >> When using the new HttpClient4 or the old Jave implementation - this NTLM >> Authorization string is not being sent or not being visible on the view >> results tree. >> >> Secondly - I configure as best as I understand the Base URL, the Username >> and Password, also tried to play with the Realm and Domain but I keep on >> getting 401 error. >> I tried different combination like username = domain\uname, uname@domain, >> uname and on Realm and Domain separately and so on. >> >> Is there someone who actually succeed on authenticate with IIS NTLM ? >> >> Best Regards, >> Shmuel Krakower. >> > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-user-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-user-h...@jakarta.apache.org
Re: Question regarding NTLM
hi seems there are some issues with HttpClient4 and NTLM http://hc.apache.org/httpcomponents-client-ga/ntlm.html. You might give the sample code a try and see if it works (standalone) , and if it does you might need to modify the Jmeter code to work with HttpClient4 regards deepak On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Shmuel Krakower wrote: > Hello everybody, > This is my first message here. > > I am load testing an IIS application which using NTLM to authenticate. > I am using the latest - 2.5 JMeter and trying to use the HTTP Authorization > Manager. > > Firstly - it seems like only with HttpClient3.1 Implemented HTTP Request > the > NTLM string is being sent (I can see it on the view results tree for the > relevant request). > When using the new HttpClient4 or the old Jave implementation - this NTLM > Authorization string is not being sent or not being visible on the view > results tree. > > Secondly - I configure as best as I understand the Base URL, the Username > and Password, also tried to play with the Realm and Domain but I keep on > getting 401 error. > I tried different combination like username = domain\uname, uname@domain, > uname and on Realm and Domain separately and so on. > > Is there someone who actually succeed on authenticate with IIS NTLM ? > > Best Regards, > Shmuel Krakower. >