Re: [Jmol-developers] feature request: "displayed" atom property

2014-01-17 Thread Alexander Rose
Hi, - Ursprüngliche Mail - > Von: "Robert Hanson" > > I'd rather not go down that route -- there are plenty of properties > like that -- selected, displayed, hidden, clickable. Where would it > end? > Ok, understandable. I'll work around it. Tanks. Best Alexander > Certainly for a

Re: [Jmol-developers] feature request: "displayed" atom property

2014-01-17 Thread Robert Hanson
I'd rather not go down that route -- there are plenty of properties like that -- selected, displayed, hidden, clickable. Where would it end? Certainly for a given atom *a* you can do this: if ({a and displayed}) {} or you can do this for (a in {displayed}) {} So I guess you could do th

Re: [Jmol-developers] feature request: "displayed" atom property

2014-01-17 Thread Robert Hanson
Oh, you mean xxx.displayed xxx.selected sure. I missed that! On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Angel Herráez wrote: > Hmmm... > Alexander was asking about an atom property, not an atomset > > El 17 Jan 2014 a las 11:17, Robert Hanson escribió: > > select displayed > > delete !displayed > > pr

Re: [Jmol-developers] feature request: "displayed" atom property

2014-01-17 Thread Robert Hanson
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Angel Herráez wrote: > > Visible is a bit different. With proteins, any atom in a group that > > is shown with a cartoon (for instance) is "visible" even though it is > > not a ball or star itself. > > So is e.g. a beta carbon in an amino acid displayed as cartoon

Re: [Jmol-developers] feature request: "displayed" atom property

2014-01-17 Thread Angel Herráez
> Visible is a bit different. With proteins, any atom in a group that > is shown with a cartoon (for instance) is "visible" even though it is > not a ball or star itself. So is e.g. a beta carbon in an amino acid displayed as cartoon only. Is that also "displayed" ? I'd expect all atoms in a r

Re: [Jmol-developers] feature request: "displayed" atom property

2014-01-17 Thread Angel Herráez
Hmmm... Alexander was asking about an atom property, not an atomset El 17 Jan 2014 a las 11:17, Robert Hanson escribió: > select displayed > delete !displayed > print {displayed} -- CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enter

Re: [Jmol-developers] feature request: "displayed" atom property

2014-01-17 Thread Robert Hanson
case T.displayed: rpn.addXBs(BSUtil.copyInvert(viewer.getHiddenSet(), atomCount)); break; case T.visible: if (!chk && !refreshed) viewer.setModelVisibility(); refreshed = true; rpn.addXBs(viewer.getVisibleSet()); break; So displ

Re: [Jmol-developers] feature request: "displayed" atom property

2014-01-17 Thread Robert Hanson
That's there. select displayed delete !displayed print {displayed} all working. Hmm... Difference between that and VISIBLE On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Alexander Rose wrote: > Hi Bob, > > any chance you could add a "displayed" atom property like the "selected" > atom property? > >

Re: [Jmol-developers] feature request: "displayed" atom property

2014-01-17 Thread Herráez Sánchez Ángel
Alexander, Maybe`visible` does what you need? De: Alexander Rose [alexander.r...@weirdbyte.de] Enviado: viernes, 17 de enero de 2014 15:08 Para: Jmol Developers Asunto: [Jmol-developers] feature request: "displayed" atom property Hi Bob, any chance you co

[Jmol-developers] feature request: "displayed" atom property

2014-01-17 Thread Alexander Rose
Hi Bob, any chance you could add a "displayed" atom property like the "selected" atom property? Best Alexander -- CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing Centu