Re: [Jmol-developers] Packaging 12.2 for Debian/Ubuntu, disabling naga
Hi, On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 06:31:08PM -0500, Robert Hanson wrote: That's checked in. See if it works to just leave out the Naga classes in the build. Thanks a lot for the effort. I tried to backport it to the stable branch, but without success so far; the code has changed quite a bit. I'll see whether I manage over the next days. Michael -- Get your Android app more play: Bring it to the BlackBerry PlayBook in minutes. BlackBerry App World#153; now supports Android#153; Apps for the BlackBerryreg; PlayBook#153;. Discover just how easy and simple it is! http://p.sf.net/sfu/android-dev2dev ___ Jmol-developers mailing list Jmol-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
Re: [Jmol-developers] Packaging 12.2 for Debian/Ubuntu, disabling naga
Hi, On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 08:44:29PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: I took a look at packaging 12.2 (congrats!) for Debian/Ubuntu, and realized it now requires the naga NIO asynchronous sockets implementation. I know you bundle the jar in your release tarball, but we have to remove all binary jars and repackage the tarball prior to build as per Debian policy and in order to comply with the Debian Free Software Guidelines. Naga has not yet been packaged for Debian, and as neither their subversion repository nor their release jarfiles have any copyright/license information (the website says MIT), this will likely not be accepted into the Debian/Ubuntu repositories for now. I have filed issue http://code.google.com/p/naga/issues/detail?id=12 to that effect. The naga maintainer has now added the requested copyright information, and we uploaded naga to Debian. Also, jmol-12.2 is now in Debian and should get synced to Ubuntu in the next days. Thanks a lot for your efforts, Michael -- RSAreg; Conference 2012 Save #36;700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 ___ Jmol-developers mailing list Jmol-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
Re: [Jmol-developers] SVN access problem
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 01:02:17PM +0200, Nicolas Vervelle wrote: SVN access should have been restored this weekend by sourceforge. I heard some project lost a couple of SVN revisions because the backup did not contain the latest state of affairs. Just as a word of warning. Michael -- ___ Jmol-developers mailing list Jmol-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
Re: [Jmol-developers] SVN access problem
Hi, On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:26:06AM +0200, Rolf Huehne wrote: since a week (starting on July 17 2015) I have problems connecting to the SVN server for mirroring the scripting documentation with the following error message: - svn: E175002: Unable to connect to a repository at URL 'https://svn.code.sf.net/p/jmol/code/trunk/Jmol-documentation/script_documentation' svn: E175002: OPTIONS of 'https://svn.code.sf.net/p/jmol/code/trunk/Jmol-documentation/script_documentation': could not connect to server (https://svn.code.sf.net) -- Q: Does anyone have similar problems or knows what's going on? Yeah, SourceForge is still partly down. Apparently git and hg are back again but not subversion, see https://twitter.com/sfnet_ops/status/624329180029677568 This is rather disconcerting on a more general level, e.g. the CP2K project is currently moving their subversion repository elsewhere. Michael -- ___ Jmol-developers mailing list Jmol-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
