Re: [Jmol-users] Vibrations

2009-05-23 Thread Laurence Marks
I let you know; I'll get some of my students (if they do what I ask which is not always true) to do something for my group web pages. The "bigger" Wien2k community is only starting to use jmol, but I expect there will be examples and I'll let you know if/when I run across some. On 5/23/09, Robert

Re: [Jmol-users] Vibrations

2009-05-23 Thread Robert Hanson
that's what I figured. The key for you is to introduce enough slop in the loadAtomDataTolerance parameter to get the job done. Since you don't have the issue of disordered crystals, you can be quite generous there -- 0.5 Angstroms easily. In other situations people will need to have a much tighter

Re: [Jmol-users] Vibrations

2009-05-23 Thread Laurence Marks
I did not get back to you yesterday -- proposals. The difference between the vibration positions in the xyz file and the atom positions in SrTiO3.struct is "right", not a concern. More explanation than you want. SrTiO3 is only cubic in an average sense at room temperature; really it is dynamically

Re: [Jmol-users] Vibrations

2009-05-23 Thread Robert Hanson
I've changed the tolerance for this and added more functionality. See http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/docs/#loadproperty Laurence, you will need to do something like: set loadAtomDataTolerance 0.2 because your vib data don't match the struct file data more precisely than that. Bob On Fri, Ma