Thanks, Bob
I will have to check those updated definitions against what is in the Wiki
(quite old stuff), which I think was mostly correct, if not exhaustive. Eric is
as
usual chasing the limit cases!
Great to sort this out.
http://wiki.jmol.org/index.php/AtomSets
> so true! Thanks, Eric. I
so true! Thanks, Eric. I see the documentation is wrong for "protein" and
missing for "nucleic" and several other not-so-obvious definitions, such as
dna, rna, purine, and pyrimidine. I have updated the documentation at
http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/docs/?&fullmanual=1&ver=14.4#atomexpressions
an
This issue is a recent change. These fragmentary residues were properly
categorized in Jmol 14.3.7_2014.09.20.
On 8/22/15 3:11 PM, Eric Martz wrote:
> In the PDB format, every atom should be a member of one of these 3
> categories: protein, nucleic, hetero.
>
> FirstGlance in Jmol has long highli
In the PDB format, every atom should be a member of one of these 3
categories: protein, nucleic, hetero.
FirstGlance in Jmol has long highlighted any 'anomalous atoms' that do
not belong to any of the above 3 categories.
It appears to me that Jmol (for a long time, including the latest Aug 17
4 matches
Mail list logo
