all three are independent:
set atomPicking
set bondPicking
set drawPicking
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Angel Herráez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 30 Aug 2008 at 14:20, Robert Hanson wrote:
> > Jmol 11.6.RC12 now has
> >
> > set atomPicking [default TRUE]
> > set bondPicking [default F
On 30 Aug 2008 at 14:20, Robert Hanson wrote:
> Jmol 11.6.RC12 now has
>
> set atomPicking [default TRUE]
> set bondPicking [default FALSE]
Nice! and quick
Are those 2 independently set, or are they alternative options?
And, how does that combine with the different "set picking" variants?
Jmol 11.6.RC12 now has
set atomPicking [default TRUE]
set bondPicking [default FALSE]
The report from the bond picking looks like this:
["bond","69 1 [GLY]37.C #263 -- [GLY]37.CA #262
1.5251089",21.2975,16.2235,6.473]
The First number is the bond ID. It is the number you would use to
Steve, there's probably not much sense in creating a generic bond-equivalent
object like that. But you can do what you say yourself. For example, if a
student is asked to click on a peptide bond, you know what bond it is, so
you can create the link yourself and, like you say, make them transparent
This is a preliminary inquiry about two feature requests. In my
MolnIquiry site, I have imbedded line objects as bonds that can then
be ?picked?; for example, students are asked to click on a peptide
bond.). Creating these objects is a task, particularly if many are
needed, and the li
5 matches
Mail list logo
