Re: [Jmol-users] Status of Java applets

2017-03-10 Thread Robert Hanson
ps -- remember that for simple molecules with only a bit of Jmol functionality, JSmol provides "JSmolLite" which can deliver a molecule with only a 40K footprint. So one mobile option would be to provide pages that do that. Bob ​

Re: [Jmol-users] Status of Java applets

2017-03-10 Thread Robert Hanson
Richard, if you are saying that the JSmol HTML5 version, though JavaScript, is not really mobile friendly, I agree. A 2-MB download itself is not particularly mobile friendly, and I am not sure to what extent phones cache downloaded files. (Anybody know?) If they do not, then that's a serious data

Re: [Jmol-users] Status of Java applets

2017-03-10 Thread Angel Herráez
Hi Richard I have a lot of pages that have been evolving alongside Jmol changes. I see no reason why "the Jmol applet-based stuff will not be convertible". Can you explain? I've converted all my Jmol applet pages to JSmol, and first I set them to use Java by default, or based on identification

[Jmol-users] Status of Java applets

2017-03-10 Thread richard.steane
Hello all I just want to sample opinion on the (security etc) status of Java in relation to Jmol applets. On my website I have quite a few (old) files based on this (http://www.biotopics.co.uk/JmolApplet/jcontentstable.html). These are all now converted to Jsmol, with the addition of a few