Egon wrote:
At 8:20 pm -0800 9/11/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 09 November 2005 10:52 am, David Leader wrote:
PS But there have been flame wars about this on the web-design list.
Sam Marshall - webmaster for the Open University - is a persuasive
advocate for the leave xhtml
On Tuesday 08 November 2005 04:07 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Further to the discussion of xhtml and html that was on this list a while
ago I ran across this website that discusses the disadvantage of using
xhtml in any except the most well-constrained environments.
Some weeks back [1] I saw
Egon Willighagen wrote:
Some weeks back [1] I saw a commit which allowed the Jmol applet to extract a
DOM fragment from the webpage,
Indeed - this was me. The code is available and working from
current CVS - I haven't finished documentation for it yet,
though, so I hadn't announced it
(I was refering to 4.0x, sorry)
David Leader wrote:
Bob wrote:
yup, that's pretty much my conclusion. Long live HTML 4.0!
It's long dead. Replaced soon after appearance by 4.01 to correct
mistakes :-)
David
PS But there have been flame wars about this on the web-design list. Sam
Further to the discussion of xhtml and html that was on this list a while
ago I ran across this website that discusses the disadvantage of using
xhtml in any except the most well-constrained environments.
http://www.hixie.ch/advocacy/xhtml
Rich
5 matches
Mail list logo
