Re: [Jmol-users] isosurface mesh resolution question

2016-02-01 Thread Bob
nt: ‎1/‎30/‎2016 9:08 AM To: "Jmol Users" Subject: Re: [Jmol-users] isosurface mesh resolution question In my case, downSample 2 makes most of the surfaces disappear, unfortunately. Because I am using a difference map, most of the surfaces are quite small to begin with— maybe their s

Re: [Jmol-users] isosurface mesh resolution question

2016-01-30 Thread Frieda Reichsman
In my case, downSample 2 makes most of the surfaces disappear, unfortunately. Because I am using a difference map, most of the surfaces are quite small to begin with— maybe their small size is causing disappearance. Any other options you can think of for smoothing small surfaces? > On Jan 28,

Re: [Jmol-users] isosurface mesh resolution question

2016-01-28 Thread Robert Hanson
Frieda, You cannot set the resolution of an isosurface that comes from a volume data file such as that using the RESOLUTION option. What you can do is use the DOWNSAMPLE option. What this does is to skip points in the grid. The RESOLUTION option is only for isosurfaces that are generated de novo b

[Jmol-users] isosurface mesh resolution question

2016-01-28 Thread Frieda Reichsman
Hi Bob, Using the following command: isosurface id ~m40 rmsd 2.0 sign red [x00dd00] within 1.5 {ret} "250u-2m-0.40.ccp4" resolution 5.0 mesh nofill; and trying to the resolution of the mesh to a finer level, I find no change in resolution from the default. I’ve tried placing “resolution 5.0” i