On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 16:33:48 GMT, XenoAmess wrote:
>> I'm getting a bit tired of seeing these JDK wide changes with lots of files
>> touched.
>> Delete all changes in desktop from this PR and re-submit them as a separate
>> PR.
>>
>> Also do not change J2DBench. We deliberately avoid using new
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 17:36:41 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> Looks like 1 is enough.
@wangweij done.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8301
> These are the changes that too many to be reviewed in 8186958, thus split
> some of them out.
XenoAmess has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
since the last revision:
change from 3 to 1 according to wangweij
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openj
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 16:56:38 GMT, XenoAmess wrote:
>> These are the changes that too many to be reviewed in 8186958, thus split
>> some of them out.
>
> XenoAmess has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> revert changes to java.deskt
> These are the changes that too many to be reviewed in 8186958, thus split
> some of them out.
XenoAmess has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
since the last revision:
revert changes to java.desktop as prrace said
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.
On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 05:11:54 GMT, XenoAmess wrote:
> Also do not change J2DBench. We deliberately avoid using new API so that we
> can take it and run it on very old JDK versions to help track regressions.
For J2DBench, I don't see any changes that not complicated with older jdk
version for no
On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 04:36:37 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
> I'm getting a bit tired of seeing these JDK wide changes with lots of files
> touched.
@prrace
I'm also a bit tired of seeing so many amazing mis-use in existed codes in jdk.
In some place I even see somebody creates a HashMap with factor
On Sat, 23 Apr 2022 14:34:58 GMT, XenoAmess wrote:
>> These are the changes that too many to be reviewed in 8186958, thus split
>> some of them out.
>
> XenoAmess has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
> commits since the last revision:
>
> - maintains compatibility wi
> These are the changes that too many to be reviewed in 8186958, thus split
> some of them out.
XenoAmess has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
commits since the last revision:
- maintains compatibility with jdk1.4 for TextTests
- fix missed space after '='
-
On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 23:31:41 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>> XenoAmess has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> add more replaces
>
> src/demo/share/java2d/J2DBench/src/j2dbench/tests/text/TextTests.java line
> 291:
>
>> 289:
>>
On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 19:24:25 GMT, XenoAmess wrote:
>> These are the changes that too many to be reviewed in 8186958, thus split
>> some of them out.
>
> XenoAmess has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> add more replaces
src/demo/
> These are the changes that too many to be reviewed in 8186958, thus split
> some of them out.
XenoAmess has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
since the last revision:
add more replaces
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/83
> These are the changes that too many to be reviewed in 8186958, thus split
> some of them out.
XenoAmess has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
commits since the last revision:
- add more replaces
- add more replaces
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openj
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 17:44:10 GMT, XenoAmess wrote:
> These are the changes that too many to be reviewed in 8186958, thus split
> some of them out.
Would you consider replacing usages of `new HashMap<>(size, 1)`, such as in
`AnnotationInvocationHandler`, as well? Such maps have a smaller table
14 matches
Mail list logo
