Re: pittance

2004-04-13 Thread Marty Landman
At 10:58 AM 4/10/2004, Uri Guttman wrote: 1. over 3 years of Perl - strong object-oriented programming in perl - must be a fast programmer. be able to write quick scripts that work (at times) [snip] $20/hour. i sent them feedback on that. i can't imagine anyone with that level of experience

Re: [hangout] Re: pittance

2004-04-13 Thread Steve Milo
Anyone read the May 2004 issue of Dr.Dobbs, there are a few articles that I find interesting (description of the P4 architecture, A Manifesto for Collabortive Tools, Motion estimation and MPEG Encoding). How many of you that have actually read those articles to completion were fully able to

Re: [hangout] Re: pittance

2004-04-13 Thread Steve Milo
On Sun, 11 Apr 2004 13:20:38 -0400, Ruben Safir Secretary NYLXS wrote There is no supply and demand issue. There is a licensing issue. Do you really think that anything which 90% of the 'competent' geeks do can't be learned by the other 140 million adults in the US or the 650,000,000 million

Re: [hangout] Re: pittance

2004-04-13 Thread Steve M
On Sun, 2004-04-11 at 16:40, Ruben Safir Secretary NYLXS wrote: This isnt a licensing issue, this is a comprehension issue. The problem with the IT profession is that there are too many 'competent geeks' and not enough professionals. What a competent geek may be capable of is beyond the

Re: [hangout] Re: pittance

2004-04-13 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
Steve == Steve M [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If what your saying is true, your in the wrong field because dependency of such 'rare' guiniess is not enough fuel for an industry to make. Steve This doesnt require the level of genius you think doesnt exist. Anyone Steve who is able to understand

Re: [hangout] Re: pittance

2004-04-13 Thread Steve Milo
Youre basing your argument on a parable? Who cares about short fictitious stories when trying to discuss facts and quantifiable results? Steve M Makes me wonder how those professionals are certified or licensed or whatever, and of what practical value to employers and managers those

RE: [hangout] Re: pittance

2004-04-13 Thread Michael Richardson
Now Now, don't let the FACTS or TRUTH get in the American way. -- In The Business World An Executive Knows Something About Everything, A Technician Knows Everything About Something, And the Switchboard Operator Knows Everything. No one person is smarter than their team!

Re: [hangout] Re: pittance

2004-04-13 Thread Chris Devers
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, Ruben Safir Secretary NYLXS wrote: A certification which is not MANDATED by the government for practice is without much value. Are the professional associations in medicine law legally mandated, or just professionally expected? I know that these fields have licenses and

RE: [hangout] Re: pittance

2004-04-13 Thread Michael Richardson
If you try to unionize IT who would the union negotiate with? -- In The Business World An Executive Knows Something About Everything, A Technician Knows Everything About Something, And the Switchboard Operator Knows Everything. No one person is smarter than their team!

Re: [hangout] Re: pittance

2004-04-13 Thread Marty Landman
At 02:37 PM 4/12/2004, Ruben Safir Secretary NYLXS wrote: Name 5 professions which is not licensed outside of IT. What about drycleaners? Whoops, just remembered the Seinfeld episode where the Drycleaners Code of Ethics was prominently mentioned. Musicians? Artists? Mechanics? Excavators?

Re: [hangout] Re: pittance

2004-04-13 Thread Chris Devers
On Sun, 11 Apr 2004, Steve Milo wrote: On Sun, 11 Apr 2004 13:23:09 -0400, The Cranky Old Man Secretary NYLXS wrote Where am I going with this? Down to unemployment to collect your check? I'm done with them. Time to start innovating again. You got a Perl job with Microsoft?

Re: [hangout] Re: pittance

2004-04-13 Thread Marty Landman
At 06:45 AM 4/13/2004, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: Similarly, sure, we can teach almost anyone to read a computer program. I don't necessarily even agree with that... wasn't this the whole concept behind COBOL? i.e. that being written in English looking verbiage the source code's meaning was then

Re: [hangout] Re: pittance

2004-04-13 Thread Ruben Safir Secretary NYLXS
But the skill to *write* a computer program is not necessarily trainable to everyone. It requires some innate sense of abstract reasoning and problem solving that is definitely available only to a small portion of the adult population in my experience. Try New York. It must be something to

Re: [hangout] Re: pittance

2004-04-13 Thread Marty Landman
At 11:29 AM 4/13/2004, Ruben Safir Secretary NYLXS wrote: Try New York. It must be something to do with the location because almost all the New Yorkers I've met can learn to do this to a degree proficient enough to be very useful programmers. Personally I think it's some kind of chemical synergy

Understanding users interfaces

2004-04-13 Thread Drew Taylor
Marty Landman wrote: My wife is a fine pianist and also an accountant. And she is very skilled at using her computer at work. Yet she still doesn't get the difference between programs and data - she'll ask me in the context of our home office where a file is and I'll ask her where she saved it

Re: [hangout] Re: pittance

2004-04-13 Thread Ruben Safir Secretary NYLXS
Maybe your *friends* in New York. Would you trust an average New York cabbie or hot dog vendor to write some subroutines for you? 100% with proper training, education and oppurtunity. In fact, this is the central thrust of life in New York. BTW - I have many friends who are cab drivers.

Re: Understanding users interfaces

2004-04-13 Thread Marty Landman
At 12:13 PM 4/13/2004, Drew Taylor wrote: believe that there are a lot of people who can learn to program to some degree. Playing devil's advocate for a moment Drew, I remember compsci 1.1 at Brooklyn College - I took the course because needed science credits, had no idea what it'd be about

Re: Understanding users interfaces

2004-04-13 Thread Barry Caplan
At 01:08 PM 4/13/2004 -0400, Marty Landman wrote: Three - google searches for specific problems and general guidelines will yield rich results if you cull, you might want to join the ACM's CHI-WEB usability list, it's really interesting imo - and the UI folks really seem to enjoy hearing things

Re: Understanding users interfaces

2004-04-13 Thread Drew Taylor
Marty Landman wrote: At 12:13 PM 4/13/2004, Drew Taylor wrote: believe that there are a lot of people who can learn to program to some degree. Playing devil's advocate for a moment Drew, I remember compsci 1.1 at Brooklyn College - I took the course because needed science credits, had snip

Re: Understanding users interfaces

2004-04-13 Thread Uri Guttman
ML == Marty Landman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ML Playing devil's advocate for a moment Drew, I remember compsci 1.1 at ML Brooklyn College - I took the course because needed science credits, ML had no idea what it'd be about (this was late 70's btw) and knew I was ML not good at the

Re: [hangout] Re: pittance

2004-04-13 Thread Ian harisay
2. CEO of any Corporation. Walt Mankowski wrote: On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 02:37:00PM -0400, Ruben Safir Secretary NYLXS wrote: You are overstating the case by a very wide margin. Name 5 professions which is not licensed outside of IT. 1.