Re: [REQUEST FOR FEEDBACK]: What small but incredibly useful utility are you missing the most in jOOQ?

group earlier > on). But I still think this needs more thinking. It won't be a .joins() > method on the select statement. It will be a table() constructor that > automatically assembles the join graph given some arguments. > > Thanks again for your input! > Lukas > > 2016-

Re: [REQUEST FOR FEEDBACK]: What small but incredibly useful utility are you missing the most in jOOQ?

gt;> fetchInto(Class) is called on a ResultQuery, where R is a generic >>>>>> type. >>>>>> It will be a bit harder to find a solution along the lines of what you're >>>>>> looking for. Perhaps, we could generate a RecordMapper<Tab

Re: [REQUEST FOR FEEDBACK]: What small but incredibly useful utility are you missing the most in jOOQ?

Hi lukas! For really complex queries is really useful query.addJoin(BOOK, JoinType.LEFT_OUTER_JOIN, BOOK.AUTHOR_ID.equal(AUTHOR.ID)); I would love a way to add a list of joins... something like query.addJoins(/* List> */) is that possible? thanks! On Friday,