:-)
-
Mike Foody
Providence HR
http://www.providencehr.com
(832) 714 1652
m...@providencehr.com
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Lukas Eder <lukas.e...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, indeed, an Observer might be a better way to abstract over a stream
> of data to merge into different t
Please excuse me if I misunstand the requirements. You want to process the
stream of data and collect it into inserts into the contact history table
and updates to the email address and then batch process these once you've
collected enough to make the batch efficient. The pain is that Java
We've solved writing back entity graphs a bit differently. The application
has a requirement for business process purposes as well as compliance
reasons to maintain a complete history of all changes. We've chosen to
support this using a bi-temporal data model. Almost every table in the
You might try creating your own function.
public Field now() {
return DSL.function("now", DateTime.class);
}
-
Mike Foody
Providence HR
http://www.providencehr.com
(832) 714 1652
m...@providencehr.com
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 7:53 PM, Samir Faci <sa...@esamir.com> wrote:
>
dsl.batchInsert(records) significantly slowed down the process.
-
Mike Foody
Providence HR
http://www.providencehr.com
(832) 714 1652
m...@providencehr.com
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Lukas Eder <lukas.e...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> Thanks a lot for your feedba
Hi Lukas,
A generated method to provide a type safe insert statement including all
the table columns would be extremely useful for us. We typically use
records to do inserts but for a few high volume processes we are batching
raw inserts. We found this significantly faster than instantiating
We're using Scala and simply using the standard collection operations to
map one object graph into another. If you're using Java 8 you should be
able to achieve something pretty concise. In our case at least we like the
no magic solution which is easy to understand and type safe.
If you can't
] asc) as limit_107798178) as
outer_limit_107798178 where rownum_107798178 ? and rownum_107798178 = (?
+ ?)
];
The column 'MUN_ID' was specified multiple times for 'limit_107798178'.
Thanks in advance!
Mike
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups jOOQ
